Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Radial Question

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Radial Question
From: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:43:45 -0800
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I use four elevated radials for 80m. What I did was hook up my analyzer to each pair, 90 degrees from one another, without connecting anything else tune for resonance (just like a dipole, which it essentially is) Then connect them all together to the vertical antenna feedpoint coax connection. This worked very well, do I have equal currents in each radial with this approach ?

Bob
K6UJ

On 2/27/16 9:32 AM, Dennis W0JX via TowerTalk wrote:
The effect of the earth on the radial generally is to detune it and make it 
longer electrically than it is. Perhaps Frank W3LPL can add something here as 
to why he recommends 70 feet.
As for elevated radials. many studies have concluded, going back as far as Les 
Moxon, that quarter-wave elevated radials are about the worst possible length 
you can make them. This particular length makes it very difficult to obtain 
equal currents in each radial. Dick Weber, K5IU, wrote an excellent article on 
this topic, stating that ideal lengths are 60 degrees (or about 2/3rds of a 
quarter wavelength) loaded by a single small coil, or 120 degrees (about 4/3rds 
of a quarter wavelength) tuned by a variable capacitor, are ideal lengths. Of 
course, a multi-band vertical complicates matters and would require a loading 
coil for each band.
73, Dennis W0JX
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>