I had no qualms about using the fence rail as a gin pole. It was after
all, stronge than many commercial poles using a rather thin wall
Aluminum Tube and much more resistant to off axis loads.
The key is testing the pole. With its ratings and resistance to taking
a permanent set, I found my "home made" gin pole to be substantially
superior to most commercial ones of the time.
Don't rule out a material because of its primary use. I'd never use
water pipe because of the significant weigh and ease of bending. The
fence rail of the proper strength is rugged. Really rugged. Much more
rugged than the larger AL tube that is often used. It easily handled
loads I would have never attempted to put on an Al tube.
I currently have a very heavy duty gin pole using a stock length 2"
6061T6 with 0.25" wall. I use two 14" long clamps 2 to 3 feet apart
when using the maximum reach. That's a 24' mast minus 4 feet for the
mounts and another foot for the top mount being a foot below the top
section where I'd be working. Always have the top pole mount at least
below the top cross braces. Tower legs are not strong at all, by
themselves. but for ease of use, I still prefer
For ease of use, I still prefer that old fence rail.
Commercial, or homemade, ALWAYS test a gin pole before use!
73
Roger (K8RI)
3/14/2016 Monday 2:21 PM, Grant Saviers wrote:
"Regular" sch40 pipe is often specified as 30kpsi yield strength, but
schxx IPS is available to 70kpsi. The example fence folks are
specifying 50kpsi and a non-standard wall thickness of 0.120" which is
in between sch20 and sch40 normal pipe sizes, 0.105" and 0.145"
respectively. If I calculated correctly, the radius of
gyration/section moment of inertia is 0.423/0.495 = 0.85 for fence
"high strength" vs sch40. Given the yield stress ratio is 50k/30k =
1.67 then the relative bending yield is 1.67 x .85 or 1.42x better for
the 0.120" wall "high strength" fence pipe. It's an interesting
result to trade the amount of steel for better steel to yield higher
bending yield stress.
Here is one fence pipe manufacturer's brochure with what they call
W40, W30, W20, and W15 grades, with varying wall thickness, usually
not the same as IPS sch40, 20, or 10. Note the W30 which seems to be
the pipe mentioned earlier in the post is hot dip galvanized on the
outside, but something different inside and also has additional
polymer coatings. The W15 goes down to 0.047 wall.
http://www.wheatland.com/images/fence_framework/Fence_Framework_Brochure.pdf
if you want to see all of the choices in "standard" pipe here is the
USS pipe brochure
http://usstubular.com/resources/library/brochures-and-catalogs/u-s-steel-tubular-products-standard-and-line-pipe
Yield strength is not the only variable in pipe performance. High
strength tube (not pipe) is Drawn Over Mandrel (DOM) to insure
uniformity of wall and strength. It may have been seam welded or
pierced bar to make the rough shape. Then there may be heat treating
to a specific hardness/strength.
Using fence pipe for gin poles which have a significant risk of life
hazard, is a risk I would not take. Rather, a DOM structural tube in
an appropriate wall thickness.
Using EMT with a 0.065" wall for a tribander on tower mast, welded
seam and electro-galvanized only on the outside is just plain nuts.
There are NO specs for the steel properties.
YMMV,
Grant KZ1W
On 3/13/2016 18:27 PM, Steve Maki wrote:
On 3/13/2016 9:01 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote:
A good alternative to schedule 40 pipe is the tubing used nowadays for
fence top rails, known as SS40. It's lighter (thinner wall) but
stronger
and actually less expensive than galvanized sch. 40 pipe if purchased
from the right place.
We routinely use it on cell sites for antenna masts in place of
sch. 40.
Here are the specs:
http://www.hooverfence.com/catalog/chart.htm
-Steve K8LX
Note that the outer diameter of fence tubing will always
be the same as the outer diameter of some standard water
pipe size. E.G. Both "1 7/8 inch" fence tubing
and "1 1/2 inch" water pipe (any schedule) actually
have an outer diameter of 1.900 inch. Either can be
shimmed with standard 2" OD aluminum irrigation pipe with
0.050 inch wall to fit standard 2.000" mast clamps
or bearings.
I don't know why they make fence tubing and pipes the
same size. One theory is that you if you want to build
a fence on steroids, water pipe can be substituted for
fence tubing very easily. (Attention: Donald Trump :-)
Or maybe they make both of them on the same equipment.
(Obviously, I have spent way too much time loitering
in hardware stores.)
Hehe.
But I'm not sure why substituting schedule 40 for SS40 in fence
applications or any other (except plumbing perhaps) would be an
*upgrade*. A quick search didn't yield specs for sch. 40 that would
lend itself to an applicable comparison, but the fence people claim
that SS40 is *stronger* than sch. 40.
In the fence business there are numerous tee couplers, etc. already
sized for stand sch 40 OD's, which probably drove the size
constraints for SS40.
-Steve K8LX
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
--
73
Roger (K8RI)
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|