There is an "exclusion" ... any
"covered" tower "adjacent" to a
house is excluded.
Couldn't find a definition for
"adjacent" in the Bill.
73, Dick, W1KSZ
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Mitch <mskobier@charter.net> wrote:
> All,
>
> I haven't seen anything on the reflector yet in regards to
> the newly signed into law aviation bill HR-636. H.R.636 - Federal Aviation
> Administration Reauthorization Act of 2016, which was signed into law by
> the
> President on July 15 2016 has some new language that affects towers over
> 50ft and less than 200ft in height. Looks like some of us (possibly many)
> may have to come into compliance with the new regulations (when they are
> developed) in regards to marking our towers. I'm in the process of erecting
> my 75ft crankup, and the new law may well have a negative impact on me. At
> this point, I think I am exempt, but not sure. Anyway, I have included a
> link to the bill for you to read for yourself. Just for a work search on
> the
> document for the word "tower" to take you to the pertinent section.
>
>
>
> https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/636/text?format=txt
>
>
>
>
>
> Mitch KJ7JA
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|