I imagine this won't affect crank-up towers, correct?
> On Jul 16, 2016, at 11:49, Richard Solomon <dickw1ksz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> There is an "exclusion" ... any
> "covered" tower "adjacent" to a
> house is excluded.
>
> Couldn't find a definition for
> "adjacent" in the Bill.
>
> 73, Dick, W1KSZ
>
>> On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Mitch <mskobier@charter.net> wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> I haven't seen anything on the reflector yet in regards to
>> the newly signed into law aviation bill HR-636. H.R.636 - Federal Aviation
>> Administration Reauthorization Act of 2016, which was signed into law by
>> the
>> President on July 15 2016 has some new language that affects towers over
>> 50ft and less than 200ft in height. Looks like some of us (possibly many)
>> may have to come into compliance with the new regulations (when they are
>> developed) in regards to marking our towers. I'm in the process of erecting
>> my 75ft crankup, and the new law may well have a negative impact on me. At
>> this point, I think I am exempt, but not sure. Anyway, I have included a
>> link to the bill for you to read for yourself. Just for a work search on
>> the
>> document for the word "tower" to take you to the pertinent section.
>>
>>
>>
>> https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/636/text?format=txt
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Mitch KJ7JA
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|