To: | towertalk@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Any thoughts on spider-beams? |
From: | Dave Thompson <thompson@mindspring.com> |
Reply-to: | Dave Thompson <thompson@mindspring.com> |
Date: | Tue, 19 Jul 2016 12:01:57 -0400 (GMT-04:00) |
List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
I thought the spiderbeam sold by Vibroplex was a better antenna than most of the other hex beams. Why? 1. It is a 3 el beam on 20 and 15 and a 4 el beam on 10. I guessed that it was a 2 el beam on 17 and 12. 2. It only requires 4 spreaders not 6 like most hex beams. I was somewhat surprised that the model supplied by K5VV was lower in gain and the pattern was so poor on 20/15/10 but then again I have not seen other hex beams modeled. 73 Dave K4JRB _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Any thoughts on spider-beams?, Patrick Greenlee |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 163, Issue 87, Arnie Pfingst |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Any thoughts on spider-beams?, Dan Maguire via TowerTalk |
Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Force 12 XR3-NV Plus, Jeff Draughn |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |