Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Coax Losses on 160 and 75?

To: jim.thom@telus.net, towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Coax Losses on 160 and 75?
From: TexasRF--- via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Reply-to: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 08:51:48 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
>From an innocent bystander (me):
 
You guys are splitting hairs over semantics here. Both of you know that  
either method of measuring coax loss is valid. The argument appears to be over 
 the use of the term "real deal". 
 
What is a "real deal" for one person may or may not be a "real deal" for  
every one. 
 
Like most things, there are multiple ways to get a job done and there is no 
 reason to think any one method is the "only" way to do it. So what if a 
given  measurement  is in error by .1 dB or .1 Watt? So what if a PL259 
connector  doesn't have "Amphenol" stamped on it?
 
Seems there is plenty to argue and discuss without such trivia!
 
73,
Gerald K5GW
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 8/6/2016 6:40:20 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
jim.thom@telus.net writes:

Date:  Fri, 5 Aug 2016 23:03:14 -0700
From: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist"  <richard@karlquist.com>
To: Jim Thomson <jim.thom@telus.net>,  towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Coax Losses on 160 and  75?

On 8/5/2016 10:00 PM, Jim Thomson wrote:

> ##  I  like the wattmeter method, then I know it?s the ....real deal.  
Just  install a 50 ohm dummy load on the
> far end..just after the  2nd  wattmeter.   Then you can test from 160- 
UHF.   Then you  get real results.

No, this isn't the real deal.  A 2 port vector  network analyzer
with full 2 port calibration is the real deal.  The  wattmeter
approach has many error effects that are difficult to  account
for.  The fact that the meters read identical when  cascaded
does not mean the subsequent measurement is perfect.
The dummy  load may have a mismatch.  The characteristic
impedance of the line is  not exactly 50 ohms and is actually
complex in general.   Etc.

For additional reading on the pitfalls of wattmeters,  see:

https://www.fars.k6ya.org/docs/K6OIK-A_Transmission_Line_Power_Paradox_and_I
ts_Resolution.pdf

Rick  N6RK

##  I read through the pdf.    My dummy load does  not have a mismatch, 
coax is 50 ohms, swr is  1:1
at each end of the  coax, and there is no reflected power..at either end.  
The 7-16 din  connectors are installed
correctly.  I use rack mount bird wattmeters,  coaxial dynamics wattmeters 
and  array solutions powermaster
digital  wattemteters and various HF couplers for different power levels.   
 The array solutions gear is not affected by temperature.

##  as  long as there is zero reflected power and swr is 1:1 at both ends, 
where are  the possible measurement errors coming from ? 
Id suggest that the results  are plenty good enough for typ ham use...for 
evaluating different coax cable  types.   The only thing I use here
is LMR 400 /600 /1200   and also RG-393...and some short lengths of 213-U.  

##  If  installing coaxial dynamics /bird sections at each end of 50 ohm 
coax is good  enough for commercial FM broadcast use, its
good enough for my  purposes.  Im suggesting to folks who have really long 
coax runs, esp  > 10 mhz, that if you installed a wattmeter
at the top of the tower, or  far end of the coax,  and apply 1 kw cxr 
through a flat swr, that you  will be in for a surprise. 

Jim   VE7RF  



_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk  mailing  list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>