Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] radial lengths ...

To: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com, towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] radial lengths ...
From: "chuck.gooden" <chuck.gooden@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 14:51:51 -0600
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
    
JimCoild you post a link to the web site please
ThxChuck Gooden n9qbt




Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone

-------- Original message --------
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> 
Date: 11/30/2016  1:05 PM  (GMT-06:00) 
To: towertalk@contesting.com 
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] radial lengths ... 

On Wed,11/30/2016 10:23 AM, StellarCAT wrote:
> So which is it – when it is stated 32 1/4 wave is that physically 1/4 wave or 
> is it physically say 1/7th wave (and still electrically 1/4 wave)?!

I consider Rudy Severns' work on radials to be definitive. He's done 
extensive, lab-grade work on the subject, and written quite coherently 
on it. Much of it was published in QEX, and all of it is on his website. 
He's carefully studied both on-ground and elevated radial systems, and 
his extensive modeling is accompanied by extensive measurements. Search 
for Antennas by N6LF.

73, Jim K9YC


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>