| To: | towertalk@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Copper Vs AL Was UV and WX deterioration of THHN insulation, and effects |
| From: | Patrick Greenlee <patrick_g@windstream.net> |
| Date: | Fri, 30 Dec 2016 12:50:55 -0600 |
| List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
Has a familiar ring to it somehow. On 12/30/2016 9:24 AM, jimlux wrote: In all cases, for any plausible thickness (up to the diameter of the wire), no significant current flows in the corroded layer.. ...or in the insulation or in the air adjacent to a bare wire...Come on fellas, the laws of physics aren't up for negotiation, a vote, or papal fiat, they is what they is. Patrick NJ5G _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
| Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] Fwd: UV and WX deterioration of THHN insulation, and effects, Hans Hammarquist via TowerTalk |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: UV and WX deterioration of THHN insulation, and effects, jimlux |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Copper Vs AL Was UV and WX deterioration of THHN insulation, and effects, jimlux |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Copper Vs AL Was UV and WX deterioration of THHN insulation, and effects, Guy Olinger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |