Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Wind survival + load ratings... vs,

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Wind survival + load ratings... vs,
From: "Jeff" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 16:17:25 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Thanks to Jim for his mechanical help on this 17/30 antenna. It will go up (if the plan holds) later this month.

I would temper Jim's comments though for the practical. It took a lot more work than I thought, it was a lot bigger than I envisioned, thanks to the monster Telrex boom which was reused it weighs a lot more than I guessed, and thanks to order errors on the new aluminum parts I spent a lot more than it should have. But it was a great educational experience for the mechanical aspect.

Having sated my appetite completely for home brew antennas with this project, I've bought the subsequent 4 from JK and that has proved to be a lot easier. ha ha. And the good thing is I'm pretty sure if we have winds again like what took my site down in March, it won't bother the new stuff at all. Fingers crossed.

73/jeff/ac0c
www.ac0c.com
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie

-----Original Message----- From: Jim Thomson
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2017 1:37 PM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] Wind survival + load ratings... vs,

Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 06:06:10 -0700
From: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] FW: Wind survival + load ratings... vs,
reality.


<Overall, hams are probably more comfortable running and believing an
<electrical model than a mechanical one (more time to become familiar,
<etc.? or just because the ham tests ask you about electrical stuff, but
<don't ask you about mechanical stuff)

<Another factor in mechanical designs is "hidden safety margin" -
<typically in a design, you don't claim the actual expected yield
<strength, you design for a bit lower (or design for a bit higher loads)
< that accounts for material properties variation, variation in
<structure strength from the assembly process, etc.

<So you might have a design which "officially" calculates out at 70
<mi/hr, but which actually survive 100, sometimes, on a lucky day, with
<the wind from the right direction.  That 100 is what gets claimed as the
<survivability.

##  Both YS and YM have been around for a loooong time, esp YS.
They are both within 1% of a megabuck finite analysis eng program.
Dont kid yourself.  Both  M2 + optibeam have not incorporated any
safety factor into their designs. They are both selling smoke. If they were
to actually incorporate  a safety factor, M2 would be rating it at  50 mph.

##  sure, one could put the boom broadside to the windstorm. The boom
is typ a lot stronger design than the eles in most cases. But thats a band aid
fix at best.

## with the changing wx patterns, it only gets worse. These once in 50 year events are appearing on an almost annual basis. We are not talking about a lot more expense involved to build a much stronger yagi.... or modifying an existing
design.

## Jeff, AC0C wanted to re-use his old 3 el 40m telrex for a new 3 el 30M full sized affair + 4 els on 17M...all on the same 29 foot oem telrex boom. The oem 40m telrex eles were aprx 52 ft long..and the loading was done with wires at the inboard end of each 40m ele...and along the boom, on insulators. We thought this would be easy, just toss the LL wires, and re-tweak for 10.125 mhz. Not so easy. Who ever designed the oem Telrex had his head up his butt, damned thing is only good for 56 mph in software. Several folks have broken els in a 65 mph windstorm. Difficult to re-enforce too, since they used odd ball wall thickness. Would require machining custom inserts etc..and even then, the max windspeed would still not be up to any standard. . In the end, it was decided to dump the telrex eles..and
design from scratch.

## so I designed the new full sized 30M eles using YM. What I ended up with is good for 106.5 mph using the no spec, wind tunnel rating..and 114 mph using the C spec. Els start at 1.75 inch OD... and taper down to just .375 inch OD tips. Els weigh just 23.6 lb each. The price tag, new from DX engineering was $366.30 for all the tubing to build 3 full sized els for 30m band. Then u got shipping on top of that, plus channel AL pieces and stauff clamps etc, etc, so they could be mounted to the oem telrex boom. End result is a beauty to behold. It will take all the ice you can throw at it. Very minimal wind sag, just 25 inches at the tips..and thats with NO ele truss. No vortex shedding, and no tubing wasted anywhere.

## while on a roll, I designed a full sized 40M REF. Starts at 2.25 inch OD...then tapers down to .375 inch OD tips, The 73.125 ft long REF weighs 61.8 lbs..and is good for 106 mph using NO spec.... and 113 mph using C spec. Ele sag at the tips is only 41 inches... with no ele truss at all. No vortex shedding.

## Its a straightforward matter to either design from scratch, factoring in standard length tubing available, or modifying an existing design, say a F12 yagi, to make it stronger, while adding no additional windload, and very minimal weight. BTW, the sag on the JK ants 80m REF is very minimal, no truss required on any of the 80m eles, and just a single truss on the 58 ft boom. NR5M now has a stack of 2 of these yagis.
https://www.facebook.com/jkantennas/photos/pcb.957987491024953/957983204358715/?type=3&theater

Jim   VE7RF


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>