I believe the article certainly is accurate with respect to trends. The NEC
tree models track well with the infinite lossy cylinder closed form solution,
which is a good double check.
But the real world, at least the one around my QTH, doesn't have a single tree
to consider but a forest of trees. One of my wire antennas is a full wave
loop in a vertical plane fed from a lower corner with ladder line. The top
and bottom runs are 100 feet and the vertical sections are 40 ft. The top is
about at 65 feet. Running EZNEC, I saw that I could get a lower takeoff angle
on 40M if I fed the middle of one of the vertical sides. But then the
polarization is primarily vertical, and those trees (hardwoods) are about 15 ft
away. I may try it anyway just to see if I can notice any difference.
For the Yagi-in-the-trees, I have that situation too. My Optibeam OB9-5 is at
70 ft but the trees are 80-100 ft high. I have 20+ feet clearance to the
nearest branch, but some of those branches approach a horizontal orientation
coming off the trunk. So like the vertical wire near the tree trunk, I suspect
there may be some tree losses.
This is interesting stuff and not easy at all to model completely. Another
reference for measurements is at
http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/jres/68D/jresv68Dn8p903_A1b.pdf
But the measurements were in a jungle environment (most of this stuff was back
in the Vietnam days).
And how about reversing the whole problem. Here's one article on using a tree
AS the antenna.
http://dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/742230.pdf
And even an old patent:
http://www.rexresearch.com/squier/squier.htm
There's even an old patent
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|