Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Quad elements no rain static.

To: "TowerTalk@contesting.com" <TowerTalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Quad elements no rain static.
From: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2018 20:36:28 -0800
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I agree with K1TTT's analysis. Another factor contributing to which antennas are noisy is how the stack is arranged. If it is the classic "Christmas Tree" layout with smallest yagi on top then that provides limited "shielding" of the voltage gradient to the lower antennas. My stack has 80m 100' long elements on top and all below it are quiet.

I think geometry differences and/or a difference in the site matter. Yagis have lots of discharge points, ie sharp edges. Quads usually don't and the feedpoints aren't at the top and wire insulation may make a difference. Also, note one recent TT post reporting that a ground wire around the rotator bearings tamed the noise. A ball bearing oil film has a breakdown voltage around a few dozen volts, in my experience. So if there is arcing across the oil film the entire mast and assembly is bouncing around in voltage.

IMO it doesn't matter if the driven elements are grounded. A current in any yagi element discharging voltage from its tip is going to introduce noise into the driven element. The corona itself is a broadband white noise source so can be picked up by other antennas. But the fact that lower ones can be quiet tends to reinforce the idea that the current in the discharging elements is the larger contributor.

Regarding charge accumulation from water and snow landing on the antenna, there is a lot to learn from the aviation world. However, aircraft are certainly contacting enormously more charged particles than precipitation landing on an yagi. What is interesting are the devices added to aircraft to dissipate the charge and eliminate radio interference.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Static_discharger
https://www.aviationpros.com/article/10386443/precipitation-static-combating-noise-and-other-effects
https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/261029.pdf

Next time I have noise, I will check my top 4L SteppIR for its noise level. It's on a tower separated from the stack. If the logic re quads is correct then a SteppIR being fully insulated should be quiet.

Grant KZ1W


On 12/5/2018 2:48 AM, Máximo EA1DDO_HK1H wrote:
It is an interesting thing, because many Yagi have the dipole at DC ground, at 
the center support, part of the gamma-match system.
I wonder if these Yagi suffer same rain noise.
By the way, not every Quad uses Gamma feed. Most are balun and coax feed.

73, Maximo


________________________________
De: TowerTalk <towertalk-bounces@contesting.com> en nombre de Alton McConnell 
<amcconnell3@hotmail.com>
Enviado: miércoles, 5 de diciembre de 2018 10:26
Para: TowerTalk@contesting.com
Asunto: [TowerTalk] Quad elements no rain static.


I believe the reason why quads do not  exhibit rain or snow static is because 
the driven element is at DC ground.

I feed mine with a tri gamma match

Sent from Samsung tablet
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>