Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 40m 4el KLM - replacing linear loading with coils

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 40m 4el KLM - replacing linear loading with coils
From: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 07:17:03 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
The forward gain difference between my single-coil and two-coil models is 0.02 dB. This is with no coil losses, whose difference might easily overwhelm a small directivity difference. But I restored the coil losses and got the same result.

Input resistance is in the mid-20s in ohms for the single coil model and in the mid-40s for two coils. I had expected band-edge reactances to be about the same for both models and thus SWR to significantly increase for the single-coil model. Instead, the reactances are similar to the input resistances, with only a small difference in band-edge SWR for the two designs when each is matched at band center.

I neglected to say that the AWG 5 copper-clad aluminum wire weighs 37.42 lbs/1000' while pure copper is 100.2 lbs/1000'. 3/16" OD refrigeration service soft copper (0.1875" instead of 0.1815") with a 0.03" wall weighs 57.5 lbs/1000'. 1/8" OD is 34.7 lbs/1000'. An optimized 7.7 uH coil using 1/8" copper is 5.6" by 3.3" with a Q of 985. (As wire diameter decreases, the proximity effect that limits coil Q decreases, which enables coils that are smaller, lighter, and cheaper.)

This describes an interesting trick for 40m Yagis:

http://ham-radio.com/k6sti/owa.htm

I had toyed with the idea of writing a little utility that generates wire segments for an element bent using dacron lines that run from somewhere near the half-element midpoints back to the boom. This would eliminate the need for a custom bent-element mount. You could even run the lines between driven element and reflector to bend both, which may improve gain even more. To do this right you need the taper schedule and tubing bending parameters. Even better would be to include the dacron line tension in the optimization parameters and then optimize everything simultaneously. I'll leave this for someone else.

If you think the 0.5 to 1 dB a conventional OWA costs in forward gain is inconsequential, check this out:

http://ham-radio.com/k6sti/pileup.htm

The analysis isn't definitive. But the next time it takes forever to bust a pileup with your OWA, you may not be able to get the probability curves out of your head.

COIL 3.90 is here:

http://ham-radio.com/k6sti/coil.zip

Brian
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>