Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Shortened Elevated Radials_Choke Balun Needed

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Shortened Elevated Radials_Choke Balun Needed
From: Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 11:55:12 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
You can also make the vert longer than 1/4 WL and that will raise the R but introduce Xl.  Fortunately a series cap fixes the Xl.  I believe that higher natural R **may** offset a bit the effect of the ground loss as the ground loss is a smaller % of the vertical element's R.  Doubt I worded that right - should not have attempted it on so little coffee this early in the AM.

73/jeff/ac0c
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
www.ac0c.com


On 8/30/20 11:34 AM, Dennis W0JX via TowerTalk wrote:
Jeff's (AC0C) comments are an excellent summary of the choices available for 
radials on 160. My main point in posting was that you can install an effective 
radial system for the low bands with radials that are shorter than 1/4 
wavelength with little efficiency penalty and a possible improvement in 
radiating pattern.
I should have mentioned that an effective choke balun at the feedpoint is 
absolutely necessary to produce effective results. See K9YC's choke cookbook 
for that information.
Lastly, depending upon angle of radials and other factors, the feedpoint 
resistance will usually be less than 50 ohms and SWR greater than 1 to 1 at 
resonance. This can be remedied by an adjustable shunt coil across the 
feedpoint.
73 W0JX
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>