To: | towertalk@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] RF Surge Suppressor at Base of Tower or Shack SPG or Both ? |
From: | Gene Smar via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com> |
Reply-to: | Gene Smar <ersmar@verizon.net> |
Date: | Tue, 12 Oct 2021 20:59:38 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
Shawn:My antenna/coax configuration is a bit different in that I have an antenna switch at the bottom of the tower. All of my HF antenna coax lines terminate on that switch before an antenna is selected and passed on to the shack's coax line. So all of these lines go through Polyphasers before they hit the switch. In that way even the non-selected antennas/coax lines are protected. I do not have a surge arrestor on the coax line from the switch to the shack. My thinking is it's entirety is underground for about 50 feet and the likelihood of an induced current on the shield is negligible. (I expect some disagreement on this.) However, the commercial practice is to place arrestors at the building/shack entrance, on a single-point ground panel that is connected to the earthing system. No arrestor is placed where the coax leaves the tower; only the shield is grounded at that spot. Therefore, I would recommend installing the arrestors at the shack entrance. If you have a legal copy of Motorola's R56, refer to the figures on page 7-42 for a pictorial. 73 de Gene Smar AD3F On 10/12/2021 6:44 PM, Keith Dutson wrote: Shack entry only. 73, Keith NM5G On Tuesday, October 12, 2021, 04:28:48 PM CDT, Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:On 10/12/2021 11:14 AM, Shawn Donley wrote:Where should the coax surge suppressors go? At the base of the tower or at the shack entry box or both?Where antennas are bonded to all the bonded grounds, where they enter the shack. They protect the rig(s) two ways. First, by bonding the coax shield, and second by shorting the center conductor to that ground. The coax shield should be bonded to the tower at top and bottom, but an arrestor at the tower is a waste of money. Remembering that lightning is an RF event, not a DC event, a 130 ft long bonding wire looks like an inductor, and is essentially a waste of copper. It's only required if you have mains power at the tower, in which case it must be run with the power conductors (as with Romex, or in conduit). The N0AX book is a great reference, to which I contributed. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk______________________________________________________________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] RF Surge Suppressor at Base of Tower or Shack SPG or Both ?, Keith Dutson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] RF Surge Suppressor at Base of Tower or Shack SPG or Both ?, Jim Brown |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] RF Surge Suppressor at Base of Tower or Shack SPG or Both ?, Keith Dutson |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] RF Surge Suppressor at Base of Tower or Shack SPG or Both ?, Jim Brown |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |