Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] RF Surge Suppressor at Base of Tower or Shack SPG or Bot

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] RF Surge Suppressor at Base of Tower or Shack SPG or Both ?
From: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 07:53:47 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Jim, et al:

What about control cables coming down the tower? I just skimmed through the first edition of Ward's grounding book. It recommends bonding the coax shields to the tower, but doesn't say anything about control cables. Typically there is a least one rotator control cable in the mix and oftentimes additional control cables for array switches and multiple Tic ring rotators on larger more sophisticated installations. That seems like an inconsistency, no?

73, Mike W4EF...........

On 10/12/2021 2:28 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
On 10/12/2021 11:14 AM, Shawn Donley wrote:
Where should the coax surge suppressors go?  At the base of the tower or at the shack entry box or both?

Where antennas are bonded to all the bonded grounds, where they enter the shack. They protect the rig(s) two ways. First, by bonding the coax shield, and second by shorting the center conductor to that ground.

The coax shield should be bonded to the tower at top and bottom, but an arrestor at the tower is a waste of money.

Remembering that lightning is an RF event, not a DC event, a 130 ft long bonding wire looks like an inductor, and is essentially a waste of copper. It's only required if you have mains power at the tower, in which case it must be run with the power conductors (as with Romex, or in conduit).

The N0AX book is a great reference, to which I contributed.

73, Jim K9YC

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>