I have both the original NANOVNA and a NANOVNA-F. The NanoVNA-F has a
larger screen and a metal case. I really like it.
73,
Don K9AQ
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 11:00 AM <towertalk-request@contesting.com> wrote:
> Send TowerTalk mailing list submissions to
> towertalk@contesting.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> towertalk-request@contesting.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> towertalk-owner@contesting.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of TowerTalk digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. NanoVNA Guidance (Richard Bell)
> 2. Re: NanoVNA Guidance (Jim Brown)
> 3. NanoVNA Guidance (Dennis OConnor)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 12:47:38 -0600
> From: Richard Bell <richfbell@sbcglobal.net>
> To: TowerTalk@contesting.com
> Subject: [TowerTalk] NanoVNA Guidance
> Message-ID: <76E1C2C1-0A9E-4823-8D30-D4FFBC0F55F5@sbcglobal.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> I?m looking to acquire a NanoVNA device but I?m undecided about which
> one. Seems like there are a number of choices out there but I?m just
> undecided about the advantages of one over another.
>
> I?m looking for suggestions from this group since I have seen them
> mentioned several times in the past.
>
> Thanks for any and all responses. This list is a great resource.
>
> 73 W5BXE Richard
> richfbell@sbcglobal.net
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 11:17:33 -0800
> From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
> To: towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] NanoVNA Guidance
> Message-ID:
> <6039ee69-d92e-4ac6-4f76-bdae425965cf@audiosystemsgroup.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> On 2/9/2022 10:47 AM, Richard Bell wrote:
> > I?m looking to acquire a NanoVNA device but I?m undecided about which
> one.
>
> Not a NanoVNA, but far superior, for 7 years, I've been using a VNWA3EC
> designed by EE prof DG8SAQ, built by some hams in the UK, and using his
> software and firmware. Very well supported both by Tom and the UK hams
> via an email reflector.
>
> https://www.sdr-kits.net/VNWA-3EC
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 14:43:05 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Dennis OConnor <ad4hk2004@yahoo.com>
> To: "towertalk@contesting.com" <towertalk@contesting.com>
> Subject: [TowerTalk] NanoVNA Guidance
> Message-ID: <1777484594.789624.1644504185652@mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> I have been happy with the NanoVNA-H4
>
> Type that into the search bar at amazon.com.
>
> Doc / k8do
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of TowerTalk Digest, Vol 230, Issue 9
> *****************************************
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|