Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] All Day Everyday Unattended FT8

To: "'Billy Cox'" <aa4nu@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] All Day Everyday Unattended FT8
From: "Mike Ryan" <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 23:15:59 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Billy and the others who have responded, thank you all.  Adding filters or 
hanging whatever in front of a radio (my friend's in this case) to compensate 
for someone else's inconsideration would (in my case) be completely out of the 
question. PERIOD. No one should be allowed to operate a station..NON STOP for 
more than 96 consecutive hours (so far this week) basically unattended. It 
would appear that the operator intends to work DXCC on 20m without even being 
in the room with the radio.  Some say that FT8 is not 'real ham radio'.  I 
disagree but in this case, the kind of operating that is going on (did I say 
OPERATING) should not be allowed, condoned, or attempted. The op in question is 
a GENERAL class operator. So I suppose the question pool for licensing such 
individuals should be changed to clearly and better explain the rules and what 
the consequences are not only to himself but the ham community that has to 
suffer his inconsideration.
          I'm sorry again to air this kind of stuff on the reflector but I have 
appreciated all your responses which I have passed along.  '73 Mike, K4CVL

-----Original Message-----
From: Billy Cox [mailto:aa4nu@comcast.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2024 10:38 PM
To: Mike Ryan
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] All Day Everyday Unattended FT8

Hi Mike, well that's not good news is it ... bummer ...

OK, perhaps "pretend" the situation is like a multi multi contest station
and what has to be addressed now is the QRM/QRN "between stations", not a
best solution (good luck with that as to the FCC or ARRL assisting), yet
one that at least allows your friend to do something to reduce the bother
and raise his/her level of enjoyment, all things considered?

Here's a link that may help toward that goal?

http://www.vibroplex.com/techdocs/INRAD/MII_W2VJN.pdf

73 Billy, AA4NU



> On 04/09/2024 8:11 PM GMT Mike Ryan <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> 
>  
> Gentlemen, Please excuse the detraction from tower / antenna related affairs
> typically noted on this most valuable reflector, but a situation has emerged
> at a friend's QTH and he has asked my help in dealing with it. My friend is
> dealing with a neighboring ham who is enamored with operating FT8 to the
> degree that he is allowing his unattended station to operate all day and
> night, every day, calling CQ and letting the auto mode answer and then begin
> again. Robot mode. This has been going on for some weeks or months. As my
> friend is within WALKING distance from the other operator, depending on
> which band the auto operated station may be on, it basically puts my friend
> out of business due to the desense. Has anyone had such experience and/or
> anyone with a suggestion(s) on dealing with such please contact me of course
> OFF LIST. Thanks in advance.    - Mike, K4CVL
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>