Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] CAT5E based RX SWITCH for remote RX ANT distribution

To: "towertalk@contesting.com" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] CAT5E based RX SWITCH for remote RX ANT distribution
From: Vojtech Ritzko via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Vojtech Ritzko <om8aw@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2025 17:53:02 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
 

   
 
 
  HI Gary
The  isolation  between  pairs  on  160m  is  close  to 80dB.RS485  does  not  
affected  the  Rx  signal at  all.Overall  SWITCH  isolation  between  antenna  
ports  are  better  than  78dB.(2 relays in series )Anyway  CAT6 can  offer 
even more  crosstalk  isolation  but  the  price  concern  was  here.
The LNAs design was driven by OIP3 and NF too.
I will return with more LNA  details later.

Bela  OM8AW
 



    On Sunday, February 9, 2025 at 04:44:51 PM GMT+1, Gary NA6O via TowerTalk 
<towertalk@contesting.com> wrote:  
 
 Very nice work Bela. One question for you. I have never measured crosstalk in 
CAT5E cable so I was wondering if the RS485 couples into the receive signals at 
all. From the data that I have seen, isolation should be very good in the HF 
bands, at least 60 dB. Good thing you have a LNA for each signal.

73,
Gary NA6O

> 
> From: Vojtech Ritzko <om8aw@yahoo.com <mailto:om8aw@yahoo.com>>
> Subject: [TowerTalk] CAT5E based RX SWITCH for remote  RX ANT
>     distribution
> 
>    HI ALL
> 
> Our QTH at OM0M ?islimited in space and there is not room for extended phased 
> beverage systems.
> I am trying my best to build system with RDF well over 14dBon limited space 
> QTH.
> 
> (Kill the side lobs and your RX will love you too.)
> 
> W1FV-9 circle for 4 directions as well as linear 4el inlinesystem for USA 
> were built in field day styleprior the CQ 160.
> 
> Well done, but how to connect the hamshack with RX HUB?
> 
> Single RG6 and CAT5E FTP ?cable were directly ?buried ?undersurrounding road? 
> in past.
> 
> Initial design - RG6 for RF and CAT5E for relay control isnot sufficient nova 
> day.
> 
> No cable duct = no way to extend anything.
> 
> The only chance is to use the unoccupied 100 Ohms pairs inCAT5E to carry RF 
> too. 
> 
> CQ WW 160 was the best chance to test RX systems in toughcontest conditions.
> 
> Technicaldetails on enclosed google disk file:
> 
> PDF :
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gTtywxB_sgZYRfgy42YB9wCTE9RqV3Cr/view?usp=sharing
> 
> Eznec for 9CC:
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1idf6JsQ32UrEQNs_7yc3hrrMWKT77DQH/view?usp=sharing
> 
> Eznec for 4el:
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/19E_VXwYVG1HiDWNU9yybygsKPt0yjeKY/view?usp=sharing
> 
> VY73 DX 
> BelaOM8AW

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
    
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>