To: | <vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [VHFcontesting] re. W3ZZ's QST contesting article (Tom Carney) |
From: | geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III) |
Date: | Thu Jun 19 16:44:37 2003 |
On Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 07:03:22PM +0000, jon jones wrote: > > The "high sunspot activity" theory does not explain why log submissions are > down for the Sept. and Jan. VHF contests, as these are not "Es driven." I was not attempting to make a link bettween Es and high or low SSN. I was linking the fact that people like myself are more likely to operate the VHF contests during low sun spot years as opposed to operating in an HF contest during the same weekend. Or in the usually limited number of weekends I can devote to a contest. -- George Fremin III - K5TR geoiii@kkn.net http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [VHFcontesting] re. W3ZZ's QST contesting article (Tom Carney), jon jones |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [VHFcontesting] re: W3ZZ's QST Contesting Article, Hoffman, Mark |
Previous by Thread: | [VHFcontesting] re. W3ZZ's QST contesting article (Tom Carney), jon jones |
Next by Thread: | [VHFcontesting] re. W3ZZ's QST contesting article (Tom Carney), Jimk8mr@aol.com |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |