VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

[VHFcontesting] No Data+only annecdotal speculation=wrongsolution

To: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: [VHFcontesting] No Data+only annecdotal speculation=wrongsolution
From: tomc7@earthlink.net (Tom Carney)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:39 2003
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>
To: "VHF Contesting eMail Remailer" <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
>
  (bunch of stuff deleted)

> pps...I disagree that there is "no data available".  We've been submitting
> electronic logs for a very long time...albeit not Cabrillo format.  Anyone
with
> rudimentary spreadsheet skills can mine the information that would be
useful >
to
> this discussion.
>
>
I took a look at the number of QSOs by the top stations during the 1997-2002
June contest.  It seems like the number of QSO these stations made would
give some indication of actiivity in their area.  Here is the total for the
top seven QSO leaders on 2M for each of the years.

  97-3873, 98-3560, 99-3964, 00-3632, 01-3311, 02-3924

While I don't see any obvious trend in this data, a simple average of the
first three years is 3799 vs the average for the last three 3622.

I will do the 6M one and post the results next.

73  Tom  KE6FI/r





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>