| To: | <vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [VHFcontesting] Timely results = Increased activity & bettersubmittal? |
| From: | w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV)) |
| Date: | Thu Jun 19 16:44:51 2003 |
> I check the logs for the ARRL 160M and 10M contests and a significant > percentage of logs received need some sort of manual editing. The robots > catch some of the mistakes (primarily in the file header), and has improved > the situation greatly. However, for the 2002 ARRL 10M contest, out of > 2100+ electronic logs over 200 needed editing...that's 10%. Excellent information, Dave. Help us to understand where things are most likely to be broken (and require manual editing), please? Ev, W2EV |
| Previous by Date: | [VHFcontesting] Timely results = Increased activity & bettersubmittal?, David A. Pruett |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [VHFcontesting] 2m Es NOW, Ev Tupis (W2EV) |
| Previous by Thread: | [VHFcontesting] Timely results = Increased activity & bettersubmittal?, David A. Pruett |
| Next by Thread: | [VHFcontesting] Timely results = Increased activity & bettersubmittal?, Hoffman, Mark |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |