VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for ERP-basedEntryClasses[was:Stupid

To: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for ERP-basedEntryClasses[was:Stupid Categories ...]
From: wbr wf4r <wbr@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 19:47:16 -0500
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
I disagree with your asertions that ERP should be a factor for determining
either hi power or low power.  It should be transmitter power out. PERIOD!
By using ERP you are forcing one who chooses to run 200 Watts or less out
of the xmtr and running a decent antenna system, to be in the same  class
as the ham who chooses to run full legal power (1500 W (PEP)) to the same
antenna system.  Let's leave the formula alone!
73, Bill, WF4R

"Ev Tupis (W2EV)" wrote:

> "Kenneth E. Harker" wrote:
> > > (Element count) x (RF Output) = Entry Category is a great way to 
> > > categorize
> > > our efforts without compromizing our future by encouraging less band-
> > > participation or band-reporting.
> >
> > This formula is FAR more complicated than using an RF output threshold for
> > categories.
>
> Yet, RF output is the wrong way to calculate entry category.  It must be ERP
> based.  Under today's rules...
> o 201-watts into a 4-element beam is HP
> o 199-watts into 4x 18xxx is LP
>
> This is the wrong way to do it.
>
> Under the ERP based proposal...the pivot point is 4,100 and...
> o 201 watts into a 4-element beam = 804 = Low Power
> o 199 watts into 4x 18xxx = 14,328 = High Power
>
> > And why would you want people to limit (of all things) their antennas?
>
> I never said anything of the sort.  This simply categorizes participation 
> better
> than the present method.  In fact...it encourages one to make sure that they 
> get
> every dB out of the number of elements they have!
>
> Ev, W2EV
> --
> PropNET: If the band is open and no one is TXing, does anyone hear it?
> HamIM  : Messaging the all-ham way, find Rovers as they go to play.
>          That HamIM, that HamIM -- I'm sure you'll like that HamIM.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ask me about either.  I'll send a URL and you can join the fun, too!
>
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting


_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>