VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

[VHFcontesting] Proposals to increase DX participation in VHFContests

To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: [VHFcontesting] Proposals to increase DX participation in VHFContests
From: "jon jones" <n0jk@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 02:54:27 +0000
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Proposed changes to the ARRL VHF Contests to increase DX station participation.

4) New categories in Jan/Jun/Sept

I recommend the establishment of a "DX Category" for the ARRL Jan/Jun/Sept VHF Contests. In the DX Category, have sub-categories for DX High Power, Low Power, Single Op Portable (QRP) and Rover. Awards such as Plaques for these, as well as certificates for the country winners. (Back in the mid 90s there was a DX Category in the ARRL VHF Contests, somehow it was dropped?)

Having a category for the DX stations would encourage more activity and log entries by DX. Could see a return of VHF Contest DXpeditions to rare countries like those by K6MYC, W6JKV and W7XU and others. This in turn will help W/VE activity. Many W/VE stations report working a DX station in the contest is often a contest "highlight" for them. I still recall working K6MYC/HR on 6M from a fire watch tower in Arkansas in the June 1983 VHF QSO Party using a ICOM-502 radio with a small yagi.

It will help to list top scoring DX stations in the QST Web contest write-up and QST print contest write-up. DX stations were conspicuously absent from the June and Sept. 2003 VHF Contest write-ups.


b) Allow DX-to-DX contacts for QSO point and multiplier credit, but the DX
station must make at least one QSO
with W/VE on each band for which QSOs are submitted.



I strongly support DX - DX QSOs in the ARRL VHF Contests. It was frustrating last June to hear KF2HC/KP2 and KP4s work Europeans on 6M (and count them in the contest) while my European QSOs from VP9 were "zero pointers."


The one W/VE QSO per band requiement for a DX entry in the VHF Contest may be problematic, however.

Consider the following:

DL1VHF works W7GJ on 50 and 144 MHz EME using JT-44 and K2UYH on 432 MHz EME in the June VHF Contest. A W/VE QSO, one per band on 50, 144 and 432 MHz. Now DL1VHF proceeds to work hundreds of Europeans on 50 MHz ES, 2,000 on 144 and 300 on 432 MHz tropo.

TI5KD enters the June VHF contest from Costa Rica. Keko works 600 W/VE stations on 6M and two in Florida on 2M meteor scatter. He also works a handful of DX stations such as ZF1DC, CO8LY, FM5WD, etc on 6M.

TI5KD is beaten in the DX Category by DL1VHF, who made 3 W/VE QSOs via EME in the contest. Is this a "level playing field" for the DX stations? Does this encourage DX to work W/VE in the VHF contests? Is there a way to create an incentive for DX to work W/VE?

Another model to consider for DX participation in the ARRL VHF Contests could be the NCJ North American QSO Party.

http://www.ncjweb.com/naqprules.php

- Jon N0JK

_________________________________________________________________
Store more e-mails with MSN Hotmail Extra Storage ? 4 plans to choose from! http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200362ave/direct/01/


_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [VHFcontesting] Proposals to increase DX participation in VHFContests, jon jones <=