VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL VHF+ contest proposals: input invited

To: "John Geiger" <johngeig@yahoo.com>,"Mike Hasselbeck" <mph@swcp.com>, <VHFcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL VHF+ contest proposals: input invited
From: "David Hinton" <ke4yyd@gtcom.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:40:49 -0500
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
John,

You have to weigh the pro and con.  Extra points for 2.3G may encourage more
participation on the higher bands but it would IMHO more discouraging to new
entry level participants.  I believe it is more important to recruit more
participants than it is to recruit existing participants to operate more
bands.  Which is more important , one person operating 10 bands or 10 people
operating one band?  I believe if we attract 10 new people to operate one
band in a contest that a significant percentage will expand to working the
higher as well as they experience the fun of contesting.

David


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Geiger" <johngeig@yahoo.com>
To: "Mike Hasselbeck" <mph@swcp.com>; <VHFcontesting@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 9:17 PM
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL VHF+ contest proposals: input invited


> Well said Mike.  I can't see how the new point rules
> encourage anyone to add more bands.  Since a 2.3G QSO
> would count the same pointwise as a 6 meter QSO, I
> would do better making a few WSJT skeds than I would
> adding new bands.  Not exactly the way to encourage
> activity on the higher frequencies.
>
> 73s John NE0P
>


_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>