| To: | vhfcontesting@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Rovers again |
| From: | Tree <tree@kkn.net> |
| Date: | Wed, 25 Feb 2004 23:00:00 -0600 |
| List-post: | <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
> The SIGNIFICANT statistic, however, was the fact that the QSO total from > grid > circling with that peer only accounted for 27% of total QSOs worked during > the > contest. Thus the high score was only dependent on grid circling in a > limited way. That statistic in no way reflects the issue at hand. Even 72% wouldn't be very close yet. Tree _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Re: VHFcontesting Digest, Vol 14, Issue 31, Tree |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [VHFcontesting] Process Goals [was: Insight from the GreatWhiteNorth], Robert McGwier |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Rovers again, John K9IJ |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Rovers again, W0eea |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |