To: | "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>,<vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [VHFcontesting] ARRL kills VHF, Should we let them? |
From: | "John Wilcox / NS1Z" <ns1z@gwi.net> |
Reply-to: | ns1z@gwi.net |
Date: | Mon, 19 Jul 2004 23:29:37 -0000 |
List-post: | <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
Well there's the rub, isn't it?? I was under the impression the officials were elected to represent ME, The MEMBER, not the organization. What a dumb cracker I turn out to be. Like Congress, somewhere along the way the mission changed... >They are elected officials, not postal clerks. As officials of the >organization, their primary mission is to insure the health of the Amateur >Service, _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF+ Rate Sheet Subscribers, R Johnson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL kills VHF, Should we let them?, Ward Silver |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL kills VHF, Should we let them?, Tree |
Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL kills VHF, Should we let them?, Ward Silver |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |