To: | VHFContesting eMail Remailer <VHFcontesting@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Understanding HamIM |
From: | Ev Tupis <w2ev@arrl.net> |
Date: | Fri, 10 Sep 2004 06:53:36 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
I'm chuckling as I write this because I'm spending so much time replying to
individual messages from a recent posting to the VHFContesting list about the
subleties of HamIM (very positive and encouraging e-mails...not disparaging in
any way), I wonder why it seems like the "nay sayers" seem to post to the list
while the others send direct. :) Here's a quick FAQ, based on the emails I've most recently received. By the way, don't confuse the thread about "Sports vs. Radiosports" with this. They are two different things... Q: What about the rule against two signals on a band? What happens if I am in the middle of a contest contact on 2m SSB, and HamIM TX's? A: You are in violation of the rules. :) This is no different of an issue than what happens if you are on 146.55 FM making a voice contact, and you forget to turn off your voice or CW CQer on 144.200. To avoid this, home stations set their HamIM TX interval to "9999" minutes. That way, it will TX once automatically, but never automatically again. Periodically, you manually TX. Rovers can either do the same thing, or (even better) use Packet Radio's ability to sense a channel that is in use and TX every 5 minutes. Because your antennas are closer, your 144.2 MHz operation will probably QRM HamIM enough to have it not TX until you are done. In all practicality...the rule exists to keep stations from monopolizing an entire band. If the violation of this rule is incidental (as in: the 0.5-second HamIM transmission on a virtually unused 147-MHz simplex frequency), I doubt you'll even have it brought to your attention. :) Still, it is better to be safe, than sorry. Q: Why FM? Why Packet? Why APRS? A: FM is very tuning-insensitive and the equipment is cheap. Just put as much RF output into your HamIM station as you can. It's simplex FM, after all. Packet is cheap, too. Even if you have to buy a KISS capable TNC. This is built on APRS technology and APRS enjoys the following of thousands on a daily basis. We talk a big talk about wanting to increase the VHF contesting ranks...here's a technology that not only helps us to squeeze out more QSO's, but it is something that may actually DRAW more mobiles into our niche (APRS is built around tracking mobiles...it's a natural!) Q: Why vertical antennas? Why not beams? A: They are cheap. (see a theme emerging?) They are omni. You never know where a HamIM rover is going to show up from. Home stations, and most rovers will want to use simple verticals. "Competition grade" rovers may wish to use a small beam if they are at any significant distance from a population center. There's nothing wrong with setting up on a hilltop, 200km away from a population center, and pointing a 4-element vertical HamIM beam to where you know there are other operators to work. Q: Why not just use an SSB liaison frequency to get noticed when Roving? A: No reason not to. HamIM has many advantages, though. On HamIM...everyone uses 147.585 MHz as that "liaison" and it is automatically monitored for you. Imagine this: You go to 144.260 (your published liaison frequency), you call CQ on SSB and are answered by a station who was waiting for you. Off you go to "work the bands". Several minutes later, someone else tunes to 144.260 to call you ('cause you said that is your liaison). Hearing nothing, they assume you're not in range yet and go off to CQ more. With HamIM, they know you're in range ('cause you are now a symbol on their screen) and they send you a keyboard message. That message will stay on your screen (it's a popup...like Internet's IM). You can reply to it (making the QSO on 2m and logging it) and tell them what band you're on now, so they can join the QSO train as it works it's way through your available bands. Rovers gotta LOVE this. Imagine a handfull of small and medium size stations with HamIM and the impact that can have on a Rover's score! 'nuf for now. Give it a try! Ev, W2EV more info: http://w2ev.rochesterny.org _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [VHFcontesting] KF0M/rover in contest, jon jones |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Fwd: [VHFcontesting] Sports vs. Radiosports, Michael Urich |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Understanding HamIM, Ev Tupis |
Next by Thread: | [VHFcontesting] 2M tropo begins..., jon jones |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |