VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Captive Rovers - a mythical beast?

To: jon jones <n0jk@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Captive Rovers - a mythical beast?
From: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 08:10:45 -0700
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 01:15:38PM +0000, jon jones wrote:
> Like the dragon or unicorn, is the captive rover is  a "mythical beast?"  I 
> think I saw one with my own eyes through the mist...
> 
> Years ago, back in the dark ages of VHF Contesting, before computer logging, 
> WSJT, FSK-441a/JT-65, Cabrillo, and web clusters existed; when VHF radios 
> "glowed in the dark" -  a great VHF Contest station was built on a hill 
> overlooking the wheatfields. It was known far and wide as "WB0DRL."
> 
> One sunny June morning, the loyal knights at WB0DRL decided they wanted to 
> win the contest in the m/m category. To further this cause, they equipped 
> several vehicles with state of the art radio gear from 50 - 2304 MHz + 10 
> GHz. Operators were recruited to drive and operate these war wagons.
> 
> Once the rovers were ready, they were sent out on their journey. Their 
> mandate was simple, drive like the south wind, stop in a new grid, work the 
> "mother station," then on to the next grid. If any other stations were 
> around - work them quickly but don't tarry. Each rover covered over 1,500 
> miles that weekend.
> 
> WB0DRL came within striking distance of winning it all.
> 
> Were these "captive" rovers?

Aside from the technicality that this predates the official creation of the 
rover category, yes - that is an excellent example.
 
-- 
Kenneth E. Harker WM5R
kenharker@kenharker.com
http://www.kenharker.com/

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>