VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] 144.200

To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] 144.200
From: Eric Watkins <shelshok@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:47:11 -0600
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
The point here wasn't to use APRS as a method of making a QSO for a 
point. Rather to use APRS as a way that base stations can track 
rovers, a practice currently "out of line" with contest rule intentions.

Rovers catch flack for using APRS unless they have no-digi set.



At 04:36 PM 6/22/2006, you wrote:
>In a message dated 6/22/06 5:24:45 PM Central Daylight Time,
>nate@natetech.com writes:
>
><< Why then not allow fully-internet connected and digipeated APRS then?  >>
>
>You mean like the increasingly popular HSMS where you can't even make a
>contact unless you're connected to the internet??
>
>:^]
>
>John K9RZZ
>
>_______________________________________________
>VHFcontesting mailing list
>VHFcontesting@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>