VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] 144.200

To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] 144.200
From: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 20:20:05 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
--- Eric Watkins <shelshok@comcast.net> wrote:

> The point here wasn't to use APRS as a method of
> making a QSO for a point. Rather to use APRS as a
> way that base stations can track rovers, a practice
> currently "out of line" with contest rule 
> intentions.

Not at all.  This is fully approved by the ARRL.

> Rovers catch flack for using APRS unless they have
> no-digi set.

Digi is relaying, which makes you "assisted" (a
category that doesn't exist in the ARRL rules for VHF
contests).  The careful rover will run high power on
simplex, and launch their frames as:
W1AAA>CQ,RFONLY:...

This will both: 1. Not digipeat -and- 2. Not go to the
Internet (because the use of non-amateur means of
communication is prohibited).

Ev, W2EV


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>