VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] CQ-VHF Rule

To: VHFContesting eMail Remailer <VHFcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] CQ-VHF Rule
From: Dexter McIntyre W4DEX <dmcintyre@att.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:34:51 -0400
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
John Lindholm wrote:

> I also note that Dex in the original inquiry did not propose a specific
> scenario in which he proposes to transfer RF from the transmitter to the
> antenna without wires.  CQ-VHF is always open to innovation and should
> there be a proposal that meets the higher good of the contest, we'd be
> happy to entertain any such suggestion.

I personally do not have a situation where this rule would 
be a problem.  Even when using a "flyswatter" on the 
microwave bands the actual antenna is still connected to the 
transmitter.  The flyswatter is just a reflector.  It just 
seems to me there should be provisions in the rules for 
someone who puts enough effort into engineering and 
operating a remote station at least from one location.  Also 
what about remote operation of a home station via IP?   I 
know an avid VHFer who's job  probably keeps him away from 
his home most of the time.  Would this rule prohibit him 
from submitting a log?  I think I understand the original 
intent of the rule but we sure don't want to stifle activity.

Dex
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>