VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS and Contesting

To: "Nate Duehr" <nate@natetech.com>,"VHF Contesting eMail Remailer" <VHFcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS and Contesting
From: "John Geiger" <aa5jg@lcisp.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 22:50:41 -0000
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Don't ask me, I didn't make the rules prohibiting self spotting.

73s John AA5JG

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Nate Duehr" <nate@natetech.com>
To: "VHF Contesting eMail Remailer" <VHFcontesting@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2007 10:32 PM
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS and Contesting


> 
> On Aug 11, 2007, at 11:52 AM, John Geiger wrote:
> 
> > Putting out a call by using an entirely RF path is not self spotting.
> > Putting out an APRS signal into the computer software, with the  
> > intent of
> > doing so, is self spotting, because you are making sure your spot  
> > ends up on
> > an non-RF system.
> >
> > 73s John AA5JG
> 
> So a multi-op can spot me, and put me on a non-RF system, but I can't  
> put myself there.  That's my contention.  What's the difference in  
> the end-result?
> 
> --
> Nate Duehr, WY0X
> nate@natetech.com
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> 
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>