VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

[VHFcontesting] Fw: APRS while roving

To: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: [VHFcontesting] Fw: APRS while roving
From: "Mike McCarty" <kb8yhv@amsat.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 06:51:33 -0600
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
>> Mac,
>> HamIM is a strategy defined as "APRS on simplex".  When used, it happens on 
>> 147.585 MHz rather than 144.39 MHz (where APRS hangs 
>> out).  It is fully allowed for all participants (including single ops).
>>
>> You and I both understand that the rules changes now appear to allow "fully 
>> assisted APRS" (on 144.39), but only for Rovers (in 
>> TX-only mode) and Multi-ops (in RX-only mode).
>>
>>
>> The implications of this rule are that multi ops will know "when/where 
>> rovers are".  I'm actually thinking about entering as a 
>> multi-op, just to play with these changes a little for myself. (I play to 
>> have fun...which I don't define by how I place relative 
>> to the "top 10"). :)
>>
>> Ev, W2EV

Ev, I understand what they were trying to do with the new rules for APRS as far 
as spotting for rovers on APRS to be used
by  multi-op stations, but you make a distinction between APRS on 144.39 and 
HamIM on 147.585, that I don't see in the rules.
As somebody who is new to this, I see HamIM as an APRS system.  You said it 
yourself, it's "APRS on simplex".  If only rovers
are allowed APRS but  are only allowed to tx callsign and position don't the 
rules preclude the use of HamIM for everybody?

 -Mac, KB8YHV

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [VHFcontesting] Fw: APRS while roving, Mike McCarty <=