VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Interpetation of VHF rule 2.3.3

To: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Interpetation of VHF rule 2.3.3
From: "Nate Duehr" <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:16:07 -0700
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
All the EME guys (going the other way on that path) can answer this
question, of course.   

"The same as going the other direction."  :-)

Nate WY0X

p.s. Yeah, I'm still lurking on the list even though I said I was leaving.
I must be a masochist.

-----Original Message-----
From: vhfcontesting-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:vhfcontesting-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of kb7dqh@donobi.net
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 8:52 AM
To: Ron Hooper
Cc: Kutzko, Sean, KX9X; vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Interpetation of VHF rule 2.3.3

Would be fun to stick some sort of beacon up there... Anyone work out what
the ERP would be to equal a reflected signal from a reasonably equipped
earth-located station?

Eric
KB7DQH

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>