VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] VHFcontesting Digest, Vol 75, Issue 24

To: VHFcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] VHFcontesting Digest, Vol 75, Issue 24
From: Ray J <Ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:41:16 -0500
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>

Some repeaters are remotely linked with the phone system.. thus using 
non-amateur means of communication..  (i'm diggin deep :-p )


more than likely is is a rule made eons ago, by someone who worked on 
the contest rule committee . They lost the contest,  because their 
competitor used a repeater to drum up a few more contacts. How very 
unfair....


w9Ray

frank bechdoldt wrote:

>  
> 
> We do have the rules stating we cant arange QSOs via FM repeaters don't we?  
> How is that much different than 40 meters during the day time ground wave 
> propigation? I used to run a net that coordinated non contest vhf plus qsos 
> on 80 meters.  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> k3uhf
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail® is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast. 
> http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_70faster_032009
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> 

-- 
This Message has been scanned By
AVG Anti-Virus 8.0.169
http://www.avg.com
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>