VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] VHFcontesting Digest, Vol 75, Issue 24

To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] VHFcontesting Digest, Vol 75, Issue 24
From: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:29:04 EDT
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
 
more  than likely is is a rule made eons ago, by someone who worked on
the  contest rule committee . They lost the contest,  because  their
competitor used a repeater to drum up a few more contacts. How  very
unfair....


w9Ray




=========================
 
Actually that rule, as well as the one concerning use of 146.52, was more  to 
protect non-contesters from contesters, whether from contesters begging on  
the repeater, or using reverse repeater splits, or tying up the national 
simplex  channel (back in the days when most FM radios were crystal 
controlled). 
 
Preventingsome other contester from making too many FM qsos was not the  
issue.
 
 
73   -   Jim    K8MR
**************Great Deals on Dell 15" Laptops - Starting at $479 
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1220029050x1201385914/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fad.doub
leclick.net%2Fclk%3B212974460%3B34272906%3Bh)
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>