VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Changes to ARRL VHF Contest Rules

To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com, chris@n9yh.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Changes to ARRL VHF Contest Rules
From: John Geiger <aa5jg@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 06:37:47 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>


--- On Wed, 5/27/09, Christopher Burke <burke166@gmail.com> wrote:

> Also 222, 902, and
> 1.2 GHz are all equally within the range of the beginning
> rover using out of
> the box equipment - one might argue that 1.2 Ghz is
> actually, in fact,
> easiest since you can get an all-mode without using a
> transverter while on
> 902 and 222 you're limited to FM only without
> transverters.  

Not if the VHF newcomber buys a used FT736R with the 6m and 222 modules 
installed in it.  Had an identical setup myself once.

73s John AA5JG


      

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>