VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Contesting Philosophy

To: "Vhfcontesting Remailer" <VHFcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Contesting Philosophy
From: "Nate Duehr" <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:34:02 -0600
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:29 -0700, "George Fremin III" <geoiii@kkn.net>
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:19:47PM -0700, Nate Duehr wrote:
> 
> > Scheduling and time management for maximization of points is ALREADY a  
> > contest skill practiced by ALL of the winning multi-operator FIXED  
> > stations.
> > 
> > Ask any WINNING multi-op station how many skeds they have and keep.
> > 
> 
> 
> I host multiops for the June VHF contest and I don't make skeds.
> 
> We have won this contest.
> 
> Maybe we would win more or by more if we did make skeds. 
> 
> I personally do not find it fun to make skeds before the contest
> so I don't do it.  I will however be glad to make a sked during the 
> contest via the contest on the bands being used for the contest.

Just got around to replying to February e-mail in August, George?  :-)  

Been there.  No problem.

I can't confirm/refute your claim that you've "won" nor in what category
or categories, since apparently ARRL doesn't publish past winners on
their website, so okay... we'll give you that one.  That is interesting,
that there's zero historical public record (other than old magazine
copies?) of past winners of the contest?  Weird.  That'd be like saying
we have no record of who won the Olympics, took 2nd place, 3rd, etc.

I just know what I've heard from talking to the regular 1st, 2nd and 3rd
place overall winners in recent years.  They have lots of skeds. 
They're not going to share the rest of their contesting "secrets" with
little old me, so whatever.  But they do win, year after year.

Since February when I posted this, I've gotten even less interested in
Contesting rules debates.  Aviation is taking over my free time, and
getting involved in debates about all the completely inconsistent rules
ARRL has between all of their contests, and that apparently have no
overall goal or strategy behind them... is utterly boring.

A recent example might be the addition of "Unlimited" rules to rovers
et. al. in June last year, but then turning around and banning the use
of Internet and other tools in the EME contest this year... why not have
a consistent strategy?  An "Unlimited" could have been created for
EME... is anyone driving the bus over there?

But that'd make too much sense... 

Thanks for the reply.  I might have been more interested in February. 
Right now, 6 months later with outdoor activities taking up more time
than they could due to WX in February, I seriously don't care... 

Had more fun flying the aircraft over the contest group for aerial
photos for the QSL card than I had operating, although I did operate a
bit at W0KVA and helped with setup and tear-down... hanging out with
friends, having fun... is of course, what it's all about in the end.

Nate WY0X
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>