VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

[VHFcontesting] Adding Assistance to a VHF Contest

To: VHF Contesting Reflector <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: [VHFcontesting] Adding Assistance to a VHF Contest
From: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:32:57 -0700
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
All of ARRL sponsored UHF/VHF contests have the same format, and with a few 
tweaks, the same rules, scoring, and categories. There is no obvious reason to 
me for these all to be the same, except I assume that over the years we have 
migrated to this uniformity by implementing a contest structure that the causes 
the least amount of complaints.

I propose that for one of the ARRL contests assistance be allowed in all 
categories. Then we can see for ourselves if the VHF/UHF contesting world comes 
to an end. I suspect that it will not. One would hope it might grow a bit. 

One subtle problem of adding categories to a contest, such as single op 
assisted, or unlimited in the SS parlance, is that categories can have 
unintended consequences. The introduction of the limited mult-op category 
appears to have reduced microwave operation by many traditional multi entrants 
and with fewer good microwave signals on the band, there appears to have been 
less overall microwave activity. I fear that the same is happening with the 
limited rover category, although it is too soon to tell for sure, rather than 
encouraging activity from rover newbies, it is siphoning activity away from 
conventional rovers and giving us fewer band/grid combinations to work. There 
are others as well. 

I think that for at least one VHF/UHF ARRL contest we should concentrate on 
devising rules that encourage activity rather than concentrating on 
implementing rules that level the playing field. These rules should still be 
fair, whatever ethical meaning that has in a ham radio contest context, but the 
proliferation of categories to make it fair should be avoided if possible.

Internet assistance, spotting clusters as it were, would be advantageous to 
this end and would be allowed. Prearranged skeds before the contest increase 
activity, are allowed now, and would continue to be allowed. Allowing ops and 
stations to submit more than a single log would help as well, particularly in 
areas where VHF activity is low. Entering and awarding certificates on a grid 
basis rather than a section basis would generate more certificates and likely 
more participation. Allow a station be located anywhere in the grid to submit a 
log from that grid, not just within a 500M circle. Awarding a certificate to 
the highest score in each club entry would increase club competition and 
overall participation. All this before we start looking at how to score the 
contest.

Perhaps there are other rule changes to encourage activity in contests?  - 
Duffey
--
KK6MC
James Duffey
Cedar Crest NM





_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>