I have been doing this. It has worked well for me. As a QRP Portable, it
seems my chances of being heard are a lot better on CW than on SSB when I'm
calling CQ; it's also a lot less QRM to people on SSB around 144.200, so I
generally call CQ within 5 kHz either way of 144.200.
73, Zack W9SZ
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Jim Mitzlaff <wb9snr1@comcast.net> wrote:
> IMHO, staying off the calling frequency in a contest is a non-starter. As
> a rover with limited antennas and power, the best way to get attention is
> to call CQ on or near the calling frequency, with one twist. I now use CW
> almost exclusively. I notice several other veteran ops in the Midwest have
> also been doing this, some for a long time.
>
> I propose that CW be used for all CQ calls within +/- 5 kHz of the calling
> frequency on 2M thru 70 cm. (I’m not including 6M because I’m not a big 6M
> operator). This would allow many more stations to call CQ near the calling
> frequency with much less interference then we have today. I don’t see so
> much problem with answering a strong CW CQ on SSB, so long as both
> operators "instantly" move off to another frequency.
>
> Those without CW capability could use 144.205 and .105 on 222 and 432 as
> the SSB "calling frequency". Digital mode CQ's could be in the within +/-
> 5 kHz of the calling frequency if their bandwidth is comparable to, say 30
> WPM CW.
>
> 73 - Jim
> W9SNR/R
> ______________________________**_________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting>
>
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|