VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] LoTW Uploads (was Logging Rovers vs the log checking

To: k5qe@k5qe.com, kc7qy@att.net, vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] LoTW Uploads (was Logging Rovers vs the log checking robots)
From: Rhinosix via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Rhinosix <rhinosix@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 09:22:40 -0500
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
I'm a grid hunter and what I want is a paper QSL that I can apply to any award 
certificate
run by any organization.  QSLs by direct, QsL manager or buro works good for me.
Jerry W2JCN


 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Marshall-K5QE <k5qe@k5qe.com>
To: kc7qy <kc7qy@att.net>; vhfcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Sent: Fri, Jan 6, 2017 9:34 pm
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] LoTW Uploads (was Logging Rovers vs the log 
checking robots)

Hello All....this entire thread is EXACTLY WHY a lot of ops will NEVER 
use LOTW.  The "security" is maniacal, it is way too hard to use, it is 
based on a defective standard, it only supports a small number of 
awards, and is a direct assault on the QSL system that has served us 
well for nearly 100 years.

I want a real QSL card that I can use for any award, anywhere, anytime.  
If anyone wants/needs a QSL card from me, all they have to do is to send 
me one of theirs(I really do appreciate an SAE too).

#NeverLOTW

73 Marshall K5QE


On 1/6/2017 5:18 PM, kc7qy@att.net wrote:
> Bill,
> Glad to see getting your logs up on LoTW, wish more people would.
>

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>