Tim, yes worth looking into..
Before we consider that, we should check local activity up there… & evernyone
bring back that information… touch base with your local coordination body as
well…
For example we have had some Packet stuff here in the Southern Ontario area in
the recent past
but not sure if its still alive.
ie. Check for Packet, APRS, links, etc .. other FM/Digital type stuff that my
have imbedded in there over time…
It would fit with the RAC bandplan technically it’s “digital”… I see the ARRL
bandplan still shows “NEW OSCAR SUB BAND 144.30- 144.5…hmmm
73 Dana VE3DS
On Jul 14, 2017, at 00:10, K7XC Tim Marek <k7xcnv1@gmail.com> wrote:
I would suggest we don't place a terrestrial Digital signal in the Middle
of traditionally a CW EME passband. What about above .300 like around
144.313?
Well below any FM activity on the band plan.
73s de Tim - K7XC - DM09jh... sk
Sent from my MetroPCS 4G LTE Android device
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|