I have had a 9 element 2M LFA up for a few years and it has worked great. Mine
is home built however and not MFJ. I used plastic electric fence insulators to
mount the elements above the boom.
TorN4OGW/5Starkville, MS
On Monday, January 28, 2019, 10:52:01 PM CST, Walter Miller, AJ6T
<aj6t@comcast.net> wrote:
Byron,
I have also been intrigued by the LFA Yagi design. I recently ordered a
Cushcraft/MFJ model LFA-2M9EL and I had hoped to get it operational by
the January VHF contest. However, due to construction and tuning
problems the antenna is still sitting on the rear deck. The first
problem I ran into was discovering that no hole had been drilled in the
boom for the first director. Hmmmm....MFJ quality assurance strikes
again. I had to drill a hole with my hand drill at the specified
location. As you noted, the solid rod elements are mounted "Cushcraft
style" to the boom. This is unlike the original G0KSC Innovantennas
design that has insulated elements. I was surprised to discover that
the antenna does not have a connector for the coax feed. You have to
make a three-turn coaxial choke balun and connect the flying leads to
the screw posts on the loop. Don't forget to waterproof those exposed
leads to prevent water from wicking into the coax. After all that I was
unable to find a smooth resonant point when adjusting the loop size with
the antenna pointed skyward. Now I'm considering making or purchasing a
ferrite bead balun to replace the three-turn coaxial choke recommended
in the Cushcraft/MFJ manual. I was surprised to discover on the G0KSC
website that Innovantennas now offers a bead balun to feed their version
of this antenna. I'll come back to attempt to resonate my LFA-2M9EL
when I have time, but for now to say that I am disappointed would be an
understatement. Of course none of this relates to the performance of
this antenna once it is tuned up and put on the air.
73, Walt, AJ6T
On 1/24/2019 5:50 PM, Byron Tatum wrote:
> Hello- Has anyone used any of the MFJ versions of the 144 or 222 Mhz G0KSC
> loop fed yagis and would be in a position to provide evaluations of them? I
> have studied the Innov versions a lot and am very interested in them. I have
> studied how well they rank in the VE7BQH yagi tables, however I guess the MFJ
> versions are too new to be included in the tables. I understand that Justin
> went to MFJ and modeled the LFA's for them using existing MFJ elements and
> booms (such as on the 13B2 and 17B2) so that new tooling would not be
> required. I like the 1/4" OD element rods on the Innov antennas. I am a
> little disappointed in MFJ keeping the 3/16" OD elements but am trying to
> keep an open mind on this. Thanks, Byron W5FH
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|