VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] VHFcontesting Digest, Vol 258, Issue 8

To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] VHFcontesting Digest, Vol 258, Issue 8
From: Ben S <bschudel2@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 16:46:13 -0500
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Running a mode besides FT8 would require venturing outside of the
herd....There is safety in the herd...hihi. S7 sigs here and everyone is
still droning away.

Oh well,
Ben KB0ZOM

On Sun, Jun 9, 2024 at 12:23 PM <vhfcontesting-request@contesting.com>
wrote:

> Send VHFcontesting mailing list submissions to
>         vhfcontesting@contesting.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         vhfcontesting-request@contesting.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         vhfcontesting-owner@contesting.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of VHFcontesting digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: PSE try FT4 on 6m (George Fremin III)
>    2. 6 meters is open for SSB. (Donald Fox)
>    3. Re: PSE try FT4 on 6m (Tim Lee)
>    4. Re: PSE try FT4 on 6m (Sid Shusterman)
>    5. Re: VHFcontesting Digest, Vol 258, Issue 7 (Guy Chabot)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 11:03:38 -0500
> From: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
> To: alex@kr1st.com
> Cc: Tim C <timcoad@gmail.com>, vhfcontesting@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] PSE try FT4 on 6m
> Message-ID: <F28FDD2F-402E-4178-AACB-B2B7A71A4DEF@kkn.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> Or just go to SSB when the band opens!
>
> George Fremin III
>
> > On Jun 9, 2024, at 9:42?AM, alex@kr1st.com wrote:
> >
> > ?I?m only sporadically in the contest this time around so I have no idea
> how 6m has been all weekend, I just noticed the opening and see most folks
> still on FT8 while FT4 could be so much more effective if more folks would
> adopt it. It?s a lot more like the old RTTY, a mode that I always liked,
> too. Even if folks would spread out a little more on FT8 than just the 3kHz
> at 313 it would be an improvement.
> >
> >
> >
> > Yes, good luck to everyone!
> >
> >
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > --Alex KR1ST
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Tim C <timcoad@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Sunday, June 9, 2024 10:13 AM
> > To: alex@kr1st.com
> > Cc: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
> > Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] PSE try FT4 on 6m
> >
> >
> >
> > Funny, Wish we had that problem here. Band has been dead for me all
> weekend so far.
> >
> >
> >
> > Good luck everyone.
> >
> > Tim
> >
> > NU6S
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 9, 2024 at 7:10?AM <alex@kr1st.com <mailto:alex@kr1st.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi there,
> >
> >
> >
> > When 6m is open like it is now, please try FT4. The 3dB loss in signal
> strength does not measure up to your signal being buried by everyone else
> wo is also staying on FT8.
> >
> >
> >
> > Of course, if you?re really daring, you can try SSB or CW. ?
> >
> >
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > --Alex KR1ST
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > VHFcontesting mailing list
> > VHFcontesting@contesting.com <mailto:VHFcontesting@contesting.com>
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > VHFcontesting mailing list
> > VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 16:19:12 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Donald Fox <taurusshoguy@yahoo.com>
> To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
> Subject: [VHFcontesting] 6 meters is open for SSB.
> Message-ID: <391302419.2036468.1717949952876@mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> GA all. Been working 6 meter SSB for the last couple of hours.
> Not a huge amount of SSB stations on, but the ones there are booming in
> from the west to EM79. I'll take a good SSB Q over digi anytime.
>
> GL    N8ECH
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 11:32:24 -0500
> From: Tim Lee <w5trl.tim@gmail.com>
> To: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
> Cc: alex@kr1st.com, Tim C <timcoad@gmail.com>,
>         vhfcontesting@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] PSE try FT4 on 6m
> Message-ID:
>         <CABTfpMN=
> cd84HM-q+v83TyrxefJGcCXT0whfc0CCfU54mySRyg@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
>   George -
>
> I agree that one of the downsides to the digital modes is how it's affected
> the QSO rate on SSB....  In the 80s I could keep pace with the best of
> operators on voice modes.....      However, it's now the rare exception
> that I don't have to repeatedly ask for folks to repeat their callsigns due
> to poor QUALITY hearing....   I still work the locals OK on SSB because I
> know/recognize them from habit.   And, for the record, hearing aids
> actually make it WORSE (regardless of hearing aid brand/technology).   Even
> P25/C4FM/DMR/etc "clear mode" FM sounds like mush to me...  So you can
> imagine how SSB sounds to me.
>
> Again, "I get it"...  however for some of us, the digital modes allow us to
> still enjoy the hobby, regardless of what old age or loud hobbies have done
> to us over the years.
>
> my .02, FWIW, YMMV, hoping you're blessed with the ability to hear things
> clearly and well for the rest of your days,
>
> 73 Tim W5TRL
>
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2024 at 11:04?AM George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net> wrote:
>
> > Or just go to SSB when the band opens!
> >
> > George Fremin III
> >
> > > On Jun 9, 2024, at 9:42?AM, alex@kr1st.com wrote:
> > >
> > > ?I?m only sporadically in the contest this time around so I have no
> idea
> > how 6m has been all weekend, I just noticed the opening and see most
> folks
> > still on FT8 while FT4 could be so much more effective if more folks
> would
> > adopt it. It?s a lot more like the old RTTY, a mode that I always liked,
> > too. Even if folks would spread out a little more on FT8 than just the
> 3kHz
> > at 313 it would be an improvement.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yes, good luck to everyone!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 73,
> > >
> > > --Alex KR1ST
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Tim C <timcoad@gmail.com>
> > > Sent: Sunday, June 9, 2024 10:13 AM
> > > To: alex@kr1st.com
> > > Cc: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
> > > Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] PSE try FT4 on 6m
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Funny, Wish we had that problem here. Band has been dead for me all
> > weekend so far.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Good luck everyone.
> > >
> > > Tim
> > >
> > > NU6S
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jun 9, 2024 at 7:10?AM <alex@kr1st.com <mailto:alex@kr1st.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi there,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > When 6m is open like it is now, please try FT4. The 3dB loss in signal
> > strength does not measure up to your signal being buried by everyone else
> > wo is also staying on FT8.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Of course, if you?re really daring, you can try SSB or CW. ?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 73,
> > >
> > > --Alex KR1ST
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > VHFcontesting mailing list
> > > VHFcontesting@contesting.com <mailto:VHFcontesting@contesting.com>
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > VHFcontesting mailing list
> > > VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > VHFcontesting mailing list
> > VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 12:55:56 -0400
> From: Sid Shusterman <k3sx@comcast.net>
> To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] PSE try FT4 on 6m
> Message-ID: <fdad7be3-c61f-4d5b-8dce-97e3d4c9d68a@comcast.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> Thank you Tim- well said. With 2 hearing aids and 2 pair of glasses the
> digital modes take some of the strain off the aging brain here too.
> 73, Sid K3SX
>
> On 6/9/2024 12:32 PM, Tim Lee wrote:
> >    George -
> >
> > I agree that one of the downsides to the digital modes is how it's
> affected
> > the QSO rate on SSB....  In the 80s I could keep pace with the best of
> > operators on voice modes.....      However, it's now the rare exception
> > that I don't have to repeatedly ask for folks to repeat their callsigns
> due
> > to poor QUALITY hearing....   I still work the locals OK on SSB because I
> > know/recognize them from habit.   And, for the record, hearing aids
> > actually make it WORSE (regardless of hearing aid brand/technology).
>  Even
> > P25/C4FM/DMR/etc "clear mode" FM sounds like mush to me...  So you can
> > imagine how SSB sounds to me.
> >
> > Again, "I get it"...  however for some of us, the digital modes allow us
> to
> > still enjoy the hobby, regardless of what old age or loud hobbies have
> done
> > to us over the years.
> >
> > my .02, FWIW, YMMV, hoping you're blessed with the ability to hear things
> > clearly and well for the rest of your days,
> >
> > 73 Tim W5TRL
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 9, 2024 at 11:04?AM George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Or just go to SSB when the band opens!
> >>
> >> George Fremin III
> >>
> >>> On Jun 9, 2024, at 9:42?AM, alex@kr1st.com wrote:
> >>>
> >>> ?I?m only sporadically in the contest this time around so I have no
> idea
> >> how 6m has been all weekend, I just noticed the opening and see most
> folks
> >> still on FT8 while FT4 could be so much more effective if more folks
> would
> >> adopt it. It?s a lot more like the old RTTY, a mode that I always liked,
> >> too. Even if folks would spread out a little more on FT8 than just the
> 3kHz
> >> at 313 it would be an improvement.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Yes, good luck to everyone!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 73,
> >>>
> >>> --Alex KR1ST
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> From: Tim C <timcoad@gmail.com>
> >>> Sent: Sunday, June 9, 2024 10:13 AM
> >>> To: alex@kr1st.com
> >>> Cc: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
> >>> Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] PSE try FT4 on 6m
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Funny, Wish we had that problem here. Band has been dead for me all
> >> weekend so far.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Good luck everyone.
> >>>
> >>> Tim
> >>>
> >>> NU6S
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Jun 9, 2024 at 7:10?AM <alex@kr1st.com <mailto:alex@kr1st.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi there,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> When 6m is open like it is now, please try FT4. The 3dB loss in signal
> >> strength does not measure up to your signal being buried by everyone
> else
> >> wo is also staying on FT8.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Of course, if you?re really daring, you can try SSB or CW. ?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 73,
> >>>
> >>> --Alex KR1ST
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> VHFcontesting mailing list
> >>> VHFcontesting@contesting.com <mailto:VHFcontesting@contesting.com>
> >>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> VHFcontesting mailing list
> >>> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> >>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> VHFcontesting mailing list
> >> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > VHFcontesting mailing list
> > VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 17:23:19 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Guy Chabot <guy.chabot@verizon.net>
> To: "vhfcontesting@contesting.com" <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] VHFcontesting Digest, Vol 258, Issue 7
> Message-ID: <786332301.3736225.1717953799971@mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
>  What is the 6 meter Frequency for FT4 ?
>     On Sunday, June 9, 2024 at 08:48:14 AM PDT,
> vhfcontesting-request@contesting.com <vhfcontesting-request@contesting.com>
> wrote:
>
>  Send VHFcontesting mailing list submissions to
> ??? vhfcontesting@contesting.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> ??? http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> ??? vhfcontesting-request@contesting.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> ??? vhfcontesting-owner@contesting.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of VHFcontesting digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> ? 1. AA4ZZ EM96 (Aa4zz)
> ? 2. PSE try FT4 on 6m (alex@kr1st.com)
> ? 3. Re: PSE try FT4 on 6m (Tim C)
> ? 4. Re: PSE try FT4 on 6m (alex@kr1st.com)
> ? 5. Re: PSE try FT4 on 6m (Tim Lee)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2024 16:47:17 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Aa4zz <aa4zz@aol.com>
> To: "vhfcontesting@contesting.com" <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
> Subject: [VHFcontesting] AA4ZZ EM96
> Message-ID: <1323093707.1946342.1717865237547@mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> The AA4ZZ team will be active in the June VHF Contest from our mountain
> top site in NW North Carolina. We will be on 50, 144, 222, and 432 Mhz. We
> have stacked beams and KWs on each band.?
> 73 Paul AA4ZZ
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 10:10:12 -0400
> From: <alex@kr1st.com>
> To: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
> Subject: [VHFcontesting] PSE try FT4 on 6m
> Message-ID: <001c01daba76$bf463e90$3dd2bbb0$@kr1st.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;??? charset="UTF-8"
>
> Hi there,
>
>
>
> When 6m is open like it is now, please try FT4. The 3dB loss in signal
> strength does not measure up to your signal being buried by everyone else
> wo is also staying on FT8.
>
>
>
> Of course, if you?re really daring, you can try SSB or CW. ?
>
>
>
> 73,
>
> --Alex KR1ST
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 07:13:28 -0700
> From: Tim C <timcoad@gmail.com>
> To: alex@kr1st.com
> Cc: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] PSE try FT4 on 6m
> Message-ID:
> ??? <CAFs6rSLCB_zLZP660AzNNDEC5FePeGPu7wP=PEPPpK4KnQyZUQ@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Funny, Wish we had that problem here. Band has been dead for me all weekend
> so far.
>
> Good luck everyone.
> Tim
> NU6S
>
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2024 at 7:10?AM <alex@kr1st.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi there,
> >
> >
> >
> > When 6m is open like it is now, please try FT4. The 3dB loss in signal
> > strength does not measure up to your signal being buried by everyone else
> > wo is also staying on FT8.
> >
> >
> >
> > Of course, if you?re really daring, you can try SSB or CW. ?
> >
> >
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > --Alex KR1ST
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > VHFcontesting mailing list
> > VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 10:27:18 -0400
> From: <alex@kr1st.com>
> To: "'Tim C'" <timcoad@gmail.com>
> Cc: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] PSE try FT4 on 6m
> Message-ID: <004701daba79$22e60500$68b20f00$@kr1st.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;??? charset="UTF-8"
>
> I?m only sporadically in the contest this time around so I have no idea
> how 6m has been all weekend, I just noticed the opening and see most folks
> still on FT8 while FT4 could be so much more effective if more folks would
> adopt it. It?s a lot more like the old RTTY, a mode that I always liked,
> too. Even if folks would spread out a little more on FT8 than just the 3kHz
> at 313 it would be an improvement.
>
>
>
> Yes, good luck to everyone!
>
>
>
> 73,
>
> --Alex KR1ST
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Tim C <timcoad@gmail.com>
> Sent: Sunday, June 9, 2024 10:13 AM
> To: alex@kr1st.com
> Cc: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] PSE try FT4 on 6m
>
>
>
> Funny, Wish we had that problem here. Band has been dead for me all
> weekend so far.
>
>
>
> Good luck everyone.
>
> Tim
>
> NU6S
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2024 at 7:10?AM <alex@kr1st.com <mailto:alex@kr1st.com> >
> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
>
>
> When 6m is open like it is now, please try FT4. The 3dB loss in signal
> strength does not measure up to your signal being buried by everyone else
> wo is also staying on FT8.
>
>
>
> Of course, if you?re really daring, you can try SSB or CW. ?
>
>
>
> 73,
>
> --Alex KR1ST
>
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com <mailto:VHFcontesting@contesting.com>
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 10:47:22 -0500
> From: Tim Lee <w5trl.tim@gmail.com>
> To: alex@kr1st.com
> Cc: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] PSE try FT4 on 6m
> Message-ID:
> ??? <CABTfpMOb7=S2a0ws++ggcLrMUE=ktNj0t_WMvx_RxL4NCGYobA@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Agreed wholeheartedly!? 6m is so up and down this contest (lots of broken
> Qs due to rapid QSB) that FT4 has a MUCH better chance of getting the
> sequences done, quicker.
>
> Out of the few that are running FT4 (about a dozen so far), I've had zero
> broken FT4 QSOs and am running a full 25-30% incompleted Qs on FT8.
>
> My .02, FWIW, YMMV,
>
> 73 Tim W5TRL
> Text or call 512-799-0308 for schedules
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2024 at 9:10?AM <alex@kr1st.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi there,
> >
> >
> >
> > When 6m is open like it is now, please try FT4. The 3dB loss in signal
> > strength does not measure up to your signal being buried by everyone else
> > wo is also staying on FT8.
> >
> >
> >
> > Of course, if you?re really daring, you can try SSB or CW. ?
> >
> >
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > --Alex KR1ST
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > VHFcontesting mailing list
> > VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of VHFcontesting Digest, Vol 258, Issue 7
> *********************************************
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of VHFcontesting Digest, Vol 258, Issue 8
> *********************************************
>
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [VHFcontesting] VHFcontesting Digest, Vol 258, Issue 8, Ben S <=