If your not entering a log then you just answered your own question
""" Obviously the second contact was a qso. """
This discussion has been hashed over many times and I don't think we are
ever going to agree on how to handle dupes.
Easy answer----- DO WHATEVER MAKES YOU COMFORTABLE.
Jim VE9WH / VE9TTY
http://ve9wh.weblink.nbtel.net/dxclusters.html
DX Cluster Telnet sites
-----Original Message-----
From: writelog-admin@contesting.com
[mailto:writelog-admin@contesting.com]On Behalf Of FireBrick
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 9:01 AM
To: writelog@contesting.com
Subject: [WriteLog] 1 MORE TIME, which qso counts?
Everyone is missing the point.
I DON'T CARE about whether I should work dupes or tell them B4.
I DON'T CARE that Cabrillo doesn't have a score included.
I DON'T CARE that the score checkers will process the log and compute a
score.
I'm probably not going to submit it anyway.
I JUST WANT TO KNOW that if I work a dupe, and seeing as how WL has the
option to not count one qso in a log and to give the credit to the second
qso, if I'm theoretically correct in 'discrediting' the first qso and
'crediting' the second.
My logic says that if I wasn't in the other guys log, then one of us made a
mistake and it was a 'no qso'. Obviously the second contact was a qso.
This DOES NOT constitute 'massaging' a log. It's strictly for my own
edification.
------------------------------------------------------------
I wonder when we'll find the answer to all the April snow...
------------------------------------------------------------
Bill H. in Chicagoland
w9ol@billnjudy.com
_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
|