I second that. I also used WL for the first time this weekend. I was
previously using a WL clone. The N1MM Logger (available for free on Yahoo)
often had problems with CW keying and just slow behavior in general. I'm
running a 1.4GHz Athlon processor and 98se. Since my previous program was
pretty much a clone of WL I had no problems at all figuring out what to do.
I'm a very happy camper.
Thanks.
-bmb
73 de w2suq
p.s. If you change your callsign, do you have to re-register WL to get it to
change the station data?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Brannigan [mailto:jbrannig@optonline.net]
> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 10:43 AM
> To: writelog@contesting.com
> Subject: [WriteLog] Kudos
>
>
> This weekend I used W/L for the ARRL CW DX contest.
> The computer is a DELL 4100 running WINMe.
> A TT OMNI-VI+ on COM1 and keying on COM2. My LAN was
> connected to TELNET to
> send spots.
> I searched and pounced, ran frequencies and had a lot of fun.
> W/L performed flawlessly.......no lock-ups, strange messages,
> file save
> problems, weird keying, slow response, lost QSO's, etc., etc., etc.
>
> The only problem was station related.
> I thought I solved my RFI problems, but on 80 and 40 the KW caused the
> dashes to be shorter and on a few freqs. on 80M, the keying
> speed dropped.
> I have more RFI proofing to do.
>
> Great product,
> 73, Jim
>
> One other item. I set F10 as the <his call> 599 NY key for running a
> frequency. When my fat finger hit F11 it wiped the call
> out!!!!! (apologies
> to those who had to send their calls a few times)
> Next contest F10 will not be used for that function.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
>
|