which is another reason to take packet/spots , etc out of the equation,ie
class... then there is no cheating..
just a thought
73 john w8wej
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert McGwier" <rwmcgwier@comcast.net>
To: <WriteLog@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 23:01
Subject: RE: [WriteLog] Open Letter to Wayne - Networking
> There will have to be a public interface to Writelog because of the
> many who do packet cheating.
>
> Bob
> N4HY
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: writelog-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:writelog-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Rob
> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 6:06 PM
> To: 'Bob McCormick W1QA'; WriteLog@contesting.com
> Subject: RE: [WriteLog] Open Letter to Wayne - Networking
>
>
> I would agree with what you are saying about the internet functionality.
It
> honestly would be more trouble than it would be worth. You would need at
> least one or two IP addresses (depending on your hardware) on each end and
> set up a VPN. This would be way beyond the expertise of 90% of the users
at
> best.
>
> Stick to TCP/IP as a private LAN, don't try to go public or you will be
> opening Pandora's a Pandora's box.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
> WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
>
_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
|