He said he "started to enter a Q". He didn't say anything about
working (trasmitting) two stations at once. WL assigns a number
as soon as you start typing in a call. You will also see
this behavior as SO2R in WL and you enter a call in each call
entry area, you will get numbers assigned, and if you wipe the
first one, that number is skipped and never reassigned.
I've given up on totally sequential numbers, and as others
have said, it doesn't matter as long as you log what was sent.
I proved this to myself last year during SS CW where I submitted
a M/S log with funky numbers and ARRL had zero problems with
that.
Chad WE9V
> -----Original Message-----
> From: writelog-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:writelog-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Bob Naumann
> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 2:38 PM
> To: writelog@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Re: Serial Numbers in Multi Operations
>
>
> Al,
>
> You are not supposed to work two stations at once as a multi-single.
>
> This is a rule violation.
>
> There is no reason for WL to allow you to do this.
>
> 73,
> Bob N5NJ
>
> ============================================================
> From: Aldewey@aol.com
> Date: 2004/11/29 Mon PM 12:07:13 CST
> To: writelog@contesting.com
> Subject: [WriteLog] Re: Serial Numbers in Multi Operations
>
> In a message dated 11/25/2004 10:31:04 PM Central Standard
> Time, Aldewey
> writes:
>
> >
> >
> > I know this has probably been discussed before but I just
> wanted to see if
> > there is a simple answer.
> >
> > In our Multi-Single SS Operation, we were running two
> networked stations.
> > If we started to enter a Q in the entry window on Station
> #1, a Serial Number
> > was automatically assigned. If the op on Station #2 starts
> to enter a Q at
> > the same time, the same serial number is assigned. Once
> these numbers are
> > assigned, there doesn't seem to be a way to change it. If
> the Qs are both
> > completed, they both go in the log with the same QSO
> Number. Does anyone know a
> > simple way around this dielemma?
> >
> > TR seems to handle this a little better. In the scenario
> described above,
> > the same Serial Number is initially assigned (just like
> WL). However, once
> > someone enters the first Q, the serial number of the second
> radio is
> > incremented automatically. It does take some coordination
> between the two ops to make
> > sure who has which number, but TR does make sure that
> duplicate serial
> > numbers do not go into the log.
> >
> > Any suggestions on how to accomplish this with WL?
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Al, K0AD
> >
> >
>
> Before reverting back to TR for Multi-Op contests with Serial
> Numbers (i.e
> SS, WPX, etc), I just wondered if anyone could point me to a
> solution to this
> problem when using Writelog. I didn't get any response to
> my original post.
>
> 73,
>
> Al, K0AD
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
> WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
> ============================================================
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
> WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
>
_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
|