WriteLog
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [WriteLog] WriteLog requires CW Driver!

To: <writelog@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] WriteLog requires CW Driver!
From: "Bob Naumann - W5OV" <W5OV@W5OV.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 18:18:47 -0600
List-post: <mailto:writelog@contesting.com>
Please allow me to revise my statement:

I said: 

"There is no program that uses LPT port CW keying on NT, 2K, or XP that does
not require some sort of intermediate LPT port driver (not a CW driver)."

I should have said: 

"There is no **full featured Windows contest logging** program **equivalent
to Writelog** that uses LPT port CW keying on NT, 2K, or XP that does not
require some sort of intermediate LPT port driver (not a CW driver)."

73,

Bob W5OV



-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Naumann - W5OV [mailto:w5ov@w5ov.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 11:25 AM
To: RLVZ@aol.com; steve@ai9t.com; writelog@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] WriteLog requires CW Driver!

The problem is that Windows XP does not permit direct access to the LPT
port, just like Windows NT and Windows 2000.

It is an operating system issue, it is not a Writelog issue.

There is no program that uses LPT port CW keying on NT, 2K, or XP that does
not require some sort of intermediate LPT port driver (not a CW driver).

If you did any research, you would find numerous references and discussions
of this issue going back for years - as I said, this goes all the way back
to Windows NT when Microsoft in their wisdom caused this whole problem.

In addition, it only takes about 5 minutes to download and install
Userport(or one of the other *FREE* solutions).  You do it once, and you
never have to think about it again.  It's just not that big of a deal.  In
fact, it's less troublesome than the old "COMTSR" situation we all "loved"
in CT to just use the serial ports.  Imagine that, a DOS program that
required you to load a serial port driver!  Not only every time you ran the
program, but once for each serial port!

If the LPT driver does not work right, it is not a Writelog problem.  
It may be a problem with your computer or it's LPT port configuration, or
you might have some other software running that uses the LPT port (print
buffer, tape backup device etc.).

Bottom line, anyone expecting to use LPT port CW keying on NT, 2K or XP
without loading some sort of intermediate driver, and perhaps doing some
config work, is simply mistaken.

73,

Bob W5OV




>  
> The only reason I purchased WriteLog was because it was supposed to
be  
> Windows XP friendly.  I have several DOS logging programs.   Fact is, 
in order to 
> use WriteLog with Windows XP for LPT Port Keying you must  download,
install, 
> and configure "Userport" or "Direct-io".  This  is fine if you have
lots of 
> time on your hands.
>  
> Using Serial Port CW Keying with Windows XP machines often requires
the 
> installation of a Serial card because most newer XP machines do not
have Serial 
> Ports built in.  My Dell and Compaq XP machines do not  have built-in
Serial 
> Ports.
>  
> When I purchased WriteLog I expected it to be a complete working
program  
> with a well documented manual.  Neither were the case.  Since I have
little 
> spare time.. WriteLog isn't operational at this QTH.
>  
> 73, K9OM
>  
>  
> In a message dated 11/15/2005 11:25:12 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, 
> steve@ai9t.com writes:
> 
> 
> I  use serial ports so no driver is required. Just a simple
interface  using
> two components. The interface is needed no mater how you key the
thing.
> I'm running XP PRO.
> 
> 73
> Steve  AI9T
> www.ai9t.com
> 
> 
> > Acutally, I believe that there is a  required third party driver for 
> > WindowsXP...either dlportio or  userport...if you want to use 
> > parallel port keying.  You can get  more information
> > from   http://www.qsl.net/n1eu/n1mm/MMKeying.htm
> >
> > WindowsXP doesn't  allow direct access to the parallel port.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> >  Mark, KD4D
> >
> > SGT Korey Chandler wrote:
> >> There is no  third party driver needed to run CW with Writelog. A 
> >> serial cable  CW keying interface or, if you want a nicer solution, 
> >> WinKeyer is  required. I've used both with good success.
> >>
> >> All the  other log programs require an external keying interface of 
> >> some  sort.
> >>
> >
> >  _______________________________________________
> > WriteLog mailing  list
> > WriteLog@contesting.com
> >  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
> > WriteLog on the  web:   http://www.writelog.com/
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog  mailing  list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
> WriteLog  on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
> WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/
> 
> 

Bob Naumann - W5OV
_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/


_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>