WriteLog
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [WriteLog] WL CW Keying Enhancement

To: "'Eric Hilding'" <dx35@hilding.com>, <writelog@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] WL CW Keying Enhancement
From: "Don Cassel" <ve3xd@rogers.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 06:55:46 -0400
List-post: <mailto:writelog@contesting.com>
Rick,

I use the ^ caret symbol sometimes between characters which gives less than
a full space. You can also use the > or > to slow down or speed up. People
sometimes have a problem with the D in my call especially in poor
conditions. So I'll use VE3X>D to give the D a little extra. It's barely
noticeable but the D is more distinctive.

Don VE3XD

-----Original Message-----
From: writelog-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:writelog-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Eric Hilding
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 10:35 PM
To: writelog@contesting.com
Subject: [WriteLog] WL CW Keying Enhancement

*** SSB Operators please press your DELETE key  ***

I've been wanting to make this suggestion for a long time, and finally
getting around to it.  During this past Field Day, the need became even more
apparent.

Computer generated keying is great, but with certain combinations of
letters, can create many unnecessary requests for repeat of a callsign at
higher speeds (not every CW op on the planet always copies well).

Part of my Field Day time was spent at the local CDF (California Division of
Forestry) EOC facilities where I took my TS-480S & WriteLog to help make
some CW QSOs for them.  The callsign used was W6HUL.

About 15% to 20% of the time, if I called a station, they came back with
W6SUL.  Many ops seemed to have difficulty with a "6" and an "H" next to
each other.  It became highly frustrating.  Even when I slowed down, the
problem was still there much of the time.  If I went to the paddles and
included a bit of extra spacing between the 6 and the H, things were better.

Over a year ago I suggested the following mod to Tree for TRlog, but don't
know if he incorporated it yet or not since I'm currently using WL for both
CW & SSB.

In addition to helping deal with the "6H" problem, over the last year I've
notice more ops reverting to the good old fashioned "bug".  Some are very
skillful, and some are very QLF.  Personally, I like the keying nuances and
rhythmic feel skilled ops bring to the art of CW using a bug, because I used
one for so many years.

My friend Jim Neiger, N6TJ, can always tell when I am sending with regular
paddles (non-bug) vs. a computer, because I add a little extra spacing
between some of the letters.  If I call stations with the paddles, I also
notice fewer requests for callsign repeats compared to computer keying
(unless they are sharp contesters who recognize my call).

So what is this leading to?

IMHO, we CW ops need the ability to incorporate "differential spacing" into
the WL CW Message fields.  Trying to solve the "6H" problem by putting a
full space between the 6 and the H doesn't cut the mustard.  It turns out
ugly ;-(

Different people with different letter/number combinations in their
callsigns need different spacing options.  I don't know if the curly braces
are used for anything else in WL, but if so, some other symbols could be
used.  I'll just use them here as an example.

Basically, the number 1 (One) would be current normal WL CW keying.  A ".75"
would be a shorter spacing, whereas "1.25" would be a longer spacing
(between characters/numbers sent).

In my case, I'll ballpark the following example from a WL CW Message line
for illustration purposes only:

%C k{1}6{1.25}v{1.2}v{1.3}a

Of course, if no {} curly brackets, regular spacing would apply.  Having the
ability to use 3 places past the decimal (i.e., 1.237) would really provide
for fine-tuning!

At 35WPM or higher speeds, depending upon a person's callsign makeup, the
ability to fine-tune and add subtle differential spacings between the
characters/numbers as desired is an extremely valuable enhancement.
Further, it can help get some "uniqueness" back on the CW bands vs. 99% of
everyone sounding the same.  Personally, I yearn for the W4KFC, DU7SV, et.al
CW fist sounds!

Taking things to the next level, adding the ability to vary the "weighting"
and/or shorten or elongate characters being sent would be absolutely
incredible.  One could really create a unique non-run-of-the-mill
"Electronic Fist" vs. the standard old HO-HUM everybody-sounds-the-same CW
being spit out of any computer logging programs on the bands today.

Umh, since I got the royal flame treatment over my past "Crusades" involving
other CW enhancements as well as added SSB WL Voice-Keying functionalities,
I expect this to be no different.  "Rolls Royce" functionality is not for
people who are comfortable with a VW...but that's OK.

Tnx & 73...

Rick, K6VVA

_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/


_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>